AT&T Tech Support 360
- Related Stories
-
Intel pledges 80 cores in five years
September 26, 2006 -
A shifting scene for chipmakers
September 25, 2006 -
Intel puts four on the floor
September 25, 2006
Chief Technical Officer Justin Rattner demonstrated the processor in San Francisco last week for a group of reporters, and the company will present a paper on the project during the International Solid State Circuits Conference in the city this week.
The chip is capable of producing 1 trillion floating-point operations per second, known as a teraflop. That's a level of performance that required 2,500 square feet of large computers a decade ago.
Intel first disclosed it had built a prototype 80-core processor during last fall's Intel Developer Forum, when CEO Paul Otellini promised to deliver the chip within five years. The company's researchers have several hurdles to overcome before PCs and servers come with 80-core processors--such as how to connect the chip to memory and how to teach software developers to write programs for it--but the research chip is an important step, Rattner said.
A company called ClearSpeed has put 96 cores on a single chip. ClearSpeed's chips are used as co-processors with supercomputers that require a powerful chip for a very specific purpose.
Intel's research chip has 80 cores, or "tiles," Rattner said. Each tile has a computing element and a router, allowing it to crunch data individually and transport that data to neighboring tiles.
Intel used 100 million transistors on the chip, which measures 275 millimeters squared. By comparison, its Core 2 Duo chip uses 291 million transistors and measures 143 millimeters squared. The chip was built using Intel's 65-nanometer manufacturing technology, but any likely product based on the design would probably use a future process based on smaller transistors. A chip the size of the current research chip is likely too large for cost-effective manufacturing.
The computing elements are very basic and do not use the x86 instruction set used by Intel and Advanced Micro Devices' chips, which means Windows Vista can't be run on the research chip. Instead, the chip uses a VLIW (very long instruction word) architecture, a simpler approach to computing than the x86 instruction set.
There's also no way at present to connect this chip to memory. Intel is working on a stacked memory chip that it could place on top of the research chip, and it's talking to memory companies about next-generation designs for memory chips, Rattner said.
Intel's researchers will then have to figure out how to create general-purpose processing cores that can handle the wide variety of applications in the world. The company is still looking at a five-year timeframe for product delivery, Rattner said.
But the primary challenge for an 80-core chip will be figuring out how to write software that can take advantage of all that horsepower. The PC software community is just starting to get its hands around multicore programming, although its server counterparts are a little further ahead. Still, Microsoft, Apple and the Linux community have a long way to go before they'll be able to effectively utilize 80 individual processing units with their PC operating systems.
"The operating system has the most control over the CPU, and it's got to change," said Jim McGregor, an analyst at In-Stat. "It has to be more intelligent about breaking things up," he said, referring to how tasks are divided among multiple processing cores.
"I think we're sort of all moving forward here together," Rattner said. "As the core count grows and people get the skills to use them effectively, these applications will come." Intel hopes to make it easier by training its army of software developers on creating tools and libraries, he said.
Intel demonstrated the chip running an application created for solving differential equations. At 3.16GHz and with 0.95 volts applied to the processor, it can hit 1 teraflop of performance while consuming 62 watts of power. Intel constructed a special motherboard and cooling system for the demonstration in a San Francisco hotel.
See more CNET content tagged:
transistor,
Intel,
memory chip,
Intel x86,
manufacturing
programmers to incorporate multiple threads into their
applications. There will, of course, be applications which aren't
easily put into multi-threaded form, so it will not be easy for all
apps to take advantage of multicore processors.
Your common applications like Microsoft Office or Internet Explorer (Firefox too, if you prefer) do not need to take immediate advantage of multiple cores. Their benefit from a dual or quad core system is that they get a chunk of CPU that is not being used by another single thread/core application. The drive to improve performance here is not at the application level until you hit some high end software such as AutoCAD or Photoshop.
Think of how long it takes your MS Word program on Windows XP with any dual core CPU to open a document, spell check that document and then print it in the highest quality. Now think of how long it took the comparable software on Windows 95 and a Pentium II (single core in case you forgot) to complete the same steps. The difference is barely noticeable.
So Apple will have to OEM it in order for your statement to be even close to reality... :-)
Considering the poor threading performance they have now...
It took sun years to figure out how to increase the bandwidth on the xbar switch, without increasing latency into the seconds realm.
IBM's Deep Blue series can utilize way more procs than any Sun system.
SGI has systems off the shelf that will scale out to THOUSANDS of processors under 1 system image. Internal system bandwidth eclipses any other system, past or present. Latency sometimes measured in nanoseconds. SGI are the highest performing, lowest latency, most secure and innovative platforms out there.
Sun didn't invent MCM (multichip modules), that work was pioneered on Gallium Arsenide wafers by Cray & IBM. Intel is a late entrant to the multi core systems. But, with Intel's volume, they will have shipped way more ncore chips than anyone else.
Have you ever even touched a Sun machine?
Secondly you will not buy the OS, you will buy CPU licenses if Microsoft decided to charge by the core count which they currently charge by the CPU. All 80 cores of this are one CPU. The current quad cores are working with Windows without having to buy two licenses (one for each pair of cores as you stated).
Lastly, it will be a while before we see any main stream desktop or server applications that use this. The most likely place for this single CPU is in very specialized research. That is much like what it is doing over the next 5 years in allowing Intel to study very dense core capacity.
This is intended to be a super computer, not a desktop computer. It will help Intel develop the future of commodity desktop and server computing which will require the use of non X86 instruction sets to get the most bang for your buck.
Porn pushes internet development.
That seems to be the way of our obsession. It's not surprising that a game convinced you to upgrade to the 386. Heck, a game is convincing me to upgrade now.
For me, it was the Coleco Adam that started this whole mess. After wearing out the Adam, I was hooked and lived the evolution from then on.
A mention at least seems appropriate especially given Intel's recent Solaris deal with Sun.
---
http://mortgage.emigrantas.com - mortgage blog
processor/core agnostic and likes a heterogenous processing
environment. I think these Software Radio Operating Systems are
quite likely to hit the desktop in 2009+ on this sort of multi-core
CPU! (also check out the Intel "Larrabee" CGPU!) I'll have to brush
up on my Corba and Dcom and Core Framework , maybe tryout
FreeRTOS or Integrity on one of the Intel systems?
Get ready. Start learning hyper-parallel application development NOW:
http://www.pervasivedatarush.com/
It's time for http://www.pervasivedatarush.com/ to hit Sun's lineup.
Gee, I wonder what 200,000,000 lines of single-threaded COBOL code will do on a terascale chip ?? Answer: Nothing more than 1 core.
/P
-James
This processor is amazing and the Intel engineers deserve recognition for such work. If Intel continues AMD will be of little threat in 5 years time.
So....
Amd, get to work and show us all something so cool it will blow our minds (read: 100 Terra Flop CPU)....
-
by MyInsight
September 22, 2008 5:37 PM PDT
- hmmmm since this thing is in theroy 20x faster than the current quad cores with that much processing power would you even need a gpu if it was flexable enough to process such instructions?
-
Reply to this comment
-
See all 39 Comments >>