AT&T Tech Support 360
Schwartz has a reputation as an ideas man, but now he's got to turn those ideas into reality. For Sun, which is still working to reverse a three-year revenue slide, that suggests a period of intense change.
Schwartz has climbed Sun's ranks since the company acquired his start-up, Lighthouse Design, in 1996. On the same day in April 2004 that Sun announced a detente with Microsoft, along with its third major round of layoffs in three years, he was promoted to president and chief operating officer.
Since then, Schwartz has pinned much of Sun's turnaround plan on software. So it is that the company's salespeople are no longer compensated simply for selling hardware. Meanwhile, the Solaris operating system is becoming open-source software, and adding a Sun database has become a real possibility.
But Schwartz intends to move beyond software into the Sun Grid--blocks of computing power that he believes will reel in new customers who previously bought and operated their own equipment. Schwartz talked with CNET News.com at the company's annual analyst event last week.
Q: Over the last year, the economy has been recovering and the server market has recovered from its revenue declines. But Sun hasn't seen nearly as much of that growth as IBM and Dell. If your sales pitch is so compelling, why is it that the revenue numbers haven't been going up to show it?
A: I think the average revenue per unit has been going down, but in terms of unit volume, I think our share has actually been growing, quite to the contrary of what you were talking about. If you look at the growth, for example, on the x86 (processor) side, we are now the market leader in Opteron servers over HP and IBM. Who would have predicted that? Where we haven't been seeing the growth necessarily has been in the high-scale data center systems, but that's been reflective of the industry as a whole.
I recognize that unit shipments are significant and understand your argument that volume begets volume, but revenue also is relevant. Do you believe that at some point the revenue will pick up, and if so, when?
Thank you for the offer, but I'm not going to make a forward-looking statement. The unit volume numbers are important to us, the revenue growth is important to us and we've grown half-over-half from last year to this year. Certainly we're prioritizing growth as a company, and the leading indicator for us of growth is the adoption of our software platforms. So we're seeing more Java-enabled handsets go out into the world, seeing more XM Satellite Radio clients go out into the world, more Solaris downloads off of the Web site--those all accrue ultimately to an infrastructure opportunity that Sun's going to get after.
Describe your vision of how computing power will be consumed by the vast majority of customers five to 10 years from now.
I think you need only look to what an average consumer does to understand what the future of the enterprise will be. Most consumers use more infrastructure that's owned and operated by other people than they use their own. For example, I have my little cell phone here. I'm actually using a great deal of my operator's infrastructure to go chat with my friends and send pictures to my parents. When I go make a dinner reservation and I go to Opentable.com...I'm using their infrastructure.
The laggards in this process have been the enterprise. Some--who
See more CNET content tagged:
Jonathan Schwartz,
Sun Microsystems Inc.,
Sun Solaris,
data center,
open source
The further the ship sinks, the louder the cries...
Sun has protected their IP while at the same time allowing others to make use of it. I await Linux to do the same -- else Linux will hit the patent wall RSN.
Of course the Linux crowd could just dump the Linux kernel and use the Sun kernel -- after all it's unencumbered.
First, Schwartz is trying to equate Linux with RedHat. According to the IDC, RedHat had a 60% marketshare through early 2004, and this is considering that they hadn't end of life'd RH8 yet. That hardly sounds like a monopoly.
Second, after saying that RedHat defines Linux, he claims that the fact that there will be a Gentoo OpenSolaris will make OpenSolaris more platform neutral and will help them defeat RedHat. Okay, so two questions: 1) if Gentoo OpenSolaris is relevent, then Gentoo Linux is just as relevent, and 2) RedHat OpenSolaris could also happen.
However, if the open source community actually did gravitate towards RedHat Linux, then it would be asinine to assume that OpenSolaris would resist the tendency of markets to consolidate on a version. Sun will be to OpenSolaris what they claim RedHat is to Linux.