- Related Stories
-
New Internet domains in the works
December 13, 2004 -
New Net domains near approval
October 29, 2004 -
The battle over triple 'x'
March 22, 2004 -
ICANN surveys proposed Net domains
March 19, 2004 -
.xxx may mark new Net address
April 23, 2001 -
ICANN staff opposes ".kids," ".xxx" domains
November 10, 2000 -
Catchy domain names lose their luster
October 16, 2000
The nonprofit organization responsible for Internet addresses on Wednesday approved ".xxx" domains, a move that reverses the group's earlier position and heads off a potential political spat with conservative U.S. politicians.
The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) said it's working with the ICM Registry to finalize remaining details, meaning the porn-friendly set of .xxx domains should be available by the end of the year. Other top-level domains still awaiting a decision from ICANN are .asia, .mail and .tel.
Stuart Lawley, chairman of the ICM Registry, could not be immediately reached for comment. In an interview last year, Lawley said that .xxx domain names would cost around $75 and come with no restrictions except that any sexually explicit content feature only adults. "Apart from child pornography, which is completely illegal, we're really not in the content-monitoring business," Lawley said.
The ICM Registry plans to handle the technical aspects of running the master database of .xxx sex sites. A second, nonprofit organization called the International Foundation For Online Responsibility will be in charge of setting the rules for .xxx. It's intended to have a seven-person board of directors, including a child advocacy advocate, a free-expression aficionado and someone from the adult entertainment industry.
ICANN's vote represents an abrupt turnabout from the group's earlier stance. In November 2000, the ICANN staff objected to the .xxx domain and rejected ICM Registry's first application.
Politicians quickly lambasted the 2000 decision. At a hearing a few months later, Rep. Fred Upton, R-Mich., demanded to know why ICANN didn't approve .xxx "as a means of protecting our kids from the awful, awful filth, which is sometimes widespread on the Internet." Sen. Joseph Lieberman, D-Conn., complained to a federal commission that .xxx was necessary to force adult Webmasters to "abide by the same standard as the proprietor of an X-rated movie theater." (Click here for a PDF of Lieberman's testimony.)
Even though the ICM Registry's approach is designed to be free-speech-friendly, the American Civil Liberties Union has expressed concern about .xxx domains. One worry is that some nations may force sites dealing with sensitive topics like homosexuality or birth control into the .xxx zone, where they can be easily blocked.
- More from News.com on this story's topics
Domain names
See more CNET content tagged:
domain,
nonprofit organization
Unlimited long distance $24.99/mo
I think that would actually be quite useful if they set a date like by 2007 all adult content, porn material must be identified by the special .xxx domain or something like that.
It remains to be seen, if major pr0n sites adopt the xxx domain. Also will the newly launched pr0n sites be forced to use a USD 75 .xxx domain? When they can get a .com domain for just 10 bucks? I don't think they could be forced to do so. And if they are forced, then I would say that ICANN is evil
I seriously don't see concrete benifits of the xxx naming scheme, except that room for more pr0n domains has been made with all the juicy .com domains having been already taken.
I would hope the xxx .com's will understand the point, and follow the plan. I think it will result in an easier operating situation for them, as well as a safer online environment for the children.
Not only is porn inmoral (and illegal in some places), but porn sites are one of the major sources of viruses, online scams and spyware. Some of them even sponsor other sites that contibute to software piracy, offering illegal downloads. Why would anyone want this trash to continue is beyond me. Honestly, who would even think about giving their credit card number to a porn site? Anyone who does it either very stupid, or very pathetic.
The idea of .xxx domains would be better if it was required that porn sites change to such domains. That way, all the trash from porn sites would be blocked from mainstream Internet. Let the perverts of the Internet have their playground, but apart from the rest of us.
I applaud the introduction of the .xxx domain and fully agree with restricting pornography to the .xxx domain. It will make finding the desired content easier for those who want or need to find it, and make it easier to stop out children being exposed to it.
JS
http://www.multiisuk.co.uk
Take one of the really big porn sites like:
http://www.sublimedirectory.com
Do they automatically get first rights to:
http://www.sublimedirectory.xxx
or what about:
http://www.sublimedirectoryxxx.com
or
http://www.sublimedirectoryx.com
?
There is going to be a lot of confusion here, people are going to scramble to register each others domains with xxx extensions.
There are not easy answers to this, but the industry standard has become .com - my prediction is that .com will just become even stronger defacto standard.
- Unfair To Adult Site Owners... Why?
-
by MistressMalice
December 8, 2005 2:23 PM PST
- I am the owner of 15 adult websites. Not only do I have special code inserted to warn search engines that my site contains adult content but I also have warnings clearly stated on the entrance pages of my sites. I for one had absolutely no problem whatsoever with transfering my domains names to xxx extension named adult sites until one cruel fact came to light. They are unconstitutionally charging extreme upcharges for domain names for the adult industry. I pay 8 a year for each domain name which boils down to about $150-200 a year now to switch all of my sites o fit into the new standards it would cost me almost a hundred per website. We're talking over $1,000 a year. That's completely ridiculous. That's like making people pay higher grocery slaes tax because they want whole milk instead of 2% milk. This is total highway robbery. This for myself is a 800% increase in domain costs. That is totally unfair to the adult market. Especially to those of us who wish to comply and work with the censors to improve the internet for children.
-
Reply to this comment
-
-
1 | 2 | Next 10 Comments >>Though personally I must stae for the record that I do not feel that ANY child should be allowed online without adult supervision EVER! If you allow your children online without supervising them the least of your problem is some adult site popping up. Your main concern should be that some psycho pedophile will make your child their next victim.
You know I don't mind letting everyone know my sites are adult orientated they clearly state that anyway, and I thought that having a xxx domain would be rather cool and may even give us higher chances of being found by those who wish to view the type of material I make available, BUT I have a BIG problem with paying $75 dollars per domain which is $67 dollars more then normal domains just because people can't be responsible enough to for babysit their own kids!