Get three services for $100/mo
- Related Stories
-
Microsoft takes wraps off Vista for business
November 30, 2006 -
Symantec gets ready for Vista
November 1, 2006 -
Microsoft: Fast start for Vista in businesses
September 29, 2006
Symantec, Trend Micro and CA are still working on products for Vista, representatives for the each of the companies said Thursday. McAfee is the only major security software maker that has products available now for the long-awaited Microsoft operating system.
"The absence of security software from the major vendors will be another reason why business will not migrate to Vista right away," said Natalie Lambert, an analyst at Forrester Research. That's in addition to the lack of support for Vista in general applications, which are the tools businesses need to run their operations, she noted.
Microsoft celebrated the launch of Vista in New York on Thursday. It is the company's first major Windows client release since Windows XP shipped in 2001. On the back of Microsoft's announcement, Symantec, McAfee, Trend Micro and CA all put out news releases promoting software for Vista PCs. Yet none announced actual product availability, except McAfee.
"McAfee is the only major security vendor with products available today that support Vista right out of the gate," said Rees Johnson, McAfee's vice president of product management. McAfee VirusScan Enterprise 8.5 and McAfee AntiSpyware Enterprise 8.5 support Vista and are available now, the company said.
The other large security vendors plan to release their corporate products for Vista over the next months. Symantec plans to release an update to AntiVirus Corporate Edition by December 31; Trend Micro expects to have a new version of OfficeScan ready in the first half of 2007; and CA's new antivirus and antispyware is due out by early February.
"I really expect all vendors to have shipping solutions before the end of the first quarter," Lambert said. "But even then, Vista rollouts will be time-consuming." Forrester doesn't expect mass deployment of the new operating system until 2008, she said.
So, while lack of security tools for Vista could mean some people will hold off from upgrading right away, it is not a major issue for the majority of business users, Lambert said. "This is not a big deal, as we will not see enterprises switching to Vista immediately," she said.
Microsoft is more optimistic. The Redmond, Wash., company predicts that Vista will be adopted by companies at twice the speed as its predecessor, Windows XP. Twelve months after the release of Vista, Microsoft expects that usage share of the oft-delayed operating system in businesses will be double that of XP a year after it shipped, the company has said.
Microsoft has promoted Vista as the most secure version of Windows yet, but has also emphasized that users will still need to run security software to protect their PCs. For example, 3 of the top 10 types of malicious software that hit PC users today can bypass Vista's security defences, security company Sophos said on its Web site Thursday.
"Microsoft continues to encourage customers to follow all of the steps of the 'Protect Your PC' guidance of enabling a firewall, applying all software updates and installing antivirus software," a Microsoft representative said.
See more CNET content tagged:
McAfee Inc.,
Trend Micro Inc.,
Microsoft Windows Vista,
security tool,
Computer Associates International Inc.
After all Microsoft said, "When you install SP2 on your Windows XP-based PC, you can feel confident that you're running the most secure Windows operating system available."
And yet over 50% of the botnets spewing spam at unpresidented levels are running Windows XP SP2.
The only way we will know if Vista is more secure is to look at its record in a couple of years.
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/sp2/overview.mspx
http://www.secureworks.com/analysis/spamthru-stats/
The slant of this CNet article is, as always, one of FUD instead of information useful to its readership. Thank goodness we're approaching a time when the protection racket the "security firms" have got going is nearing an end.
I personally use NOD and the built in XP fire wall with my Linksys NAT router, and I have of years... total number of virus on my system. 0. Total CPU time lost to Antivirus scanners 1-2% unlike Symtantec which was 15 to 25%.
You know, I finally figured out why these security companies like dual cores.. it's so their bloat ware has a cpu of it's own. I'm even more glad that at least for a few months I won't be having to remove their garbage from my clients new Vista computers. (can you tell I really don't like Symantec products?)
I had never heard of nod until you mentioned it. Checked it out, looks impressive. But I'm wondering why I haven't heard of it before...
Six years on and Microsoft haters are still ignorants.
Stop counting your chickens before they hatch!!!
Walt
- Vista not ready for the market
-
by kFuQ
December 3, 2006 8:07 AM PST
- nothing m$ has ever made has been "really ready"
-
Reply to this comment
-
See all 21 Comments >>