August 31, 2004 12:48 PM PDT
For CEOs, offshoring pays
- Related Stories
-
IBM to hire even more new workers
August 12, 2004 -
Offshoring: U.S. needs reforms, not rhetoric
May 4, 2004 -
Report: Offshore IT outsourcing helps economy
March 30, 2004 -
Tech professionals group wary of offshoring
March 18, 2004
The study, published by two groups concerned with economic inequality, found that average CEO compensation at the 50 firms outsourcing the most service jobs abroad increased by 46 percent in 2003. CEOs at the 365 large companies surveyed by Business Week only saw an average raise of 9 percent, according to the report from the Institute for Policy Studies and United for a Fair Economy.
CEOs at top offshore outsourcers earned an average of $10.4 million in 2003, while average CEO compensation hit $8.1 million, according to the report. From 2001 to 2003, the top 50 outsourcing CEOs earned $2.2 billion while sending an estimated 200,000 jobs overseas, the report said.
"These 50 CEOs seem to be personally benefiting from a trend that has already cost hundreds of thousands of U.S. jobs and is projected to cost millions more over the next decade," the report said.
Offshore outsourcing, farming out tasks to lower-wage nations, has become a hot-button issue over the past year or so. Defenders of the practice--including President Bush's top economic advisor--say it ultimately assists the U.S. economy. But critics say it costs U.S. workers jobs and threatens the country's long-term tech leadership. The exact scale of the trend remains unclear.
The new report names a number of technology companies in its list of leading offshore outsourcers. IBM is among them. Big Blue has plans to shift about 2,000 U.S. jobs abroad this year, but it also is hiring thousands of employees in the United States. According to Tuesday's report, IBM CEO Sam Palmisano's pay reached $7.7 million in 2003, up 13 percent from 2002.
The report lists a more dramatic increase in pay for Stephen Bennett, CEO of Intuit, which makes personal-finance software. Bennett got a 425 percent pay increase in 2003 to $22.3 million while sending call center jobs to India, the study says.
Neither IBM nor Intuit immediately returned requests for comment.
The study also said the so-called CEO-to-worker wage gap is rising again, after two years of narrowing. The ratio of CEO pay to worker pay reached 301:1 in 2003, up from 282:1 in 2002. If the minimum wage had increased as quickly as CEO pay since 1990, it would be $15.76 per hour, rather than the current $5.15 per hour, according to the study.
See more CNET content tagged:
pay,
outsourcing company,
study,
CEO,
Intuit Inc.
Nah....
Half for the Republican political du jour and half for the CEO.
Long life to Machiavelli CEO's.
basically, they are happy to pay higher salaries - as long as it's their own. This should be pushed by the media as anti-patriotism and anti-Americanism. i can't stand the current media angle of these stories - as if making working class Americans suffer for the sake of a dollar is the "American Way". The "American Way" is posted on the Statue of Liberty - I think it has something to do with us taking care of each other. Are these Corporations taking care of thier fellow Americans? Are they treating us as first and other countries second??? Come on press, get on them - it's your job as Americans.
Execs get rich; meanwhile they don?t give a damn when it turns into a nightmare. My direct and objective experience with IT outsourcing is that it?s a disaster. Tasks are sent overseas after promises are made to execs about the experience and skill of foreign programmers. CEOs and execs take these promises at face value, without looking deeper; they want to hear all of the bullsh*t claims that outsourcing will save millions while ?improving? IT processes. Don?t make me laugh. As someone in-the-real-world, who has to deal with this everyday, it?s a nightmare. A ******* nightmare. When the rubber hits the road, the ?skill? and ?experience? are dramatically lower than advertised. In addition, language and cultural obstacles make the situation even worse. And, to make things even worse, when the execs (who made the outsourcing decision in the first place) hear how bad the situation is going, the assh*les don?t want to hear it. All they want to hear is the good news, not the bad news. Executives turn into the worst kind of selfish and manipulating leaders.
Hmmmmmm.....
The first of these: Pass the Income Equity Act introduced by Congressman Martin Sabo. This legislation, H.R. 2888, "would cap the tax deduction for executive pay at 25 times the salary of the lowest-paid full-time worker in a firm."
For more, head to Sabo's Web site at http://sabo.house.gov, then click "Legislation" and "Sponsored Legislation."
but this is just disgusting. What can we do? I for one refuse to continue to drive up my credit to buy corporate products that make CEOs adn stockholders wealthy. if that means I go without, then good for me. Money in my bank instead of theirs.
I also refuse to give them 60 hours of work for 40 hours of pay. let them fire me. i don't care any more. i'm not wasting my sweat equity to put money in there pocket.
Once a registered republican, the republican party can go screw. Tax breaks to the rich, trickle down economics my as*. What does Georgie boy, larry ellison, or billy gates need a tax break for when they have millions/billiions? and now, as this study shows, it's not just the shareholders gaining, but the ceo. And i'm sure if you dug a little deeper, it'd be the VPs, C-level executive directors gaining as well.
I hope one day for an insurrection against all corporate greed. There IS a point at which one person has MORE THAN HIS SHARE. Poverty is on the rise, according to an MSNBC article, the rich really are getting richer.
and you know what? SHame on all american workers for passively allowing it to happen.
shame shame shame.
The American Corporations are more succesful (look at F2000 list) than the rest of the world because they think global - not just US. Most of the corporations have done a fantastic job of getting more than 50% of their revenues from international regions (and replacing jobs and local businesses in other countries - but that's another topic). The corporations that think global and look at the world as one big pool of resources and one big pool of customers, without boundaries, will be the more successful ones remaining on this highly connected planet.
The second reason American Corporations are successful is because they reward capitalism. American Corporations truly capitalize on ideas and opportunities and reward individuals purely on achievement (with some exceptions like Enron). CEOs that show results by growing revenue during economic growth and by cutting costs during recession should, indeed, be rewarded more than CEOs that don't produce results. A CEO's role is to improve the company's bottom line, and the company's (or the board's) job is to reward the CEO.
I, for one American, would not want American Corporations to stop thinking global and stop applying capitalism principles.
I believe a truly neutral article would have investigated into what results those CEOs acheived for their corporations. I think the CEO to Worker is something to be concerned of, but is nothing related to offshoring. With this disturbing trend of articles, should I expect a News.com article linking terrorism and war on offshoring? I hope the readers are more savvy than the writers of this article and not believing that every written word is correct.
- Wait!!
-
by
August 21, 2005 11:16 PM PDT
- Actually, True Capitalism and Free Market Trade are the same thing. This should explain why the attack on one has the nasty result of spilling over onto the other. They are the same thing. We do not exist within a true Capitalist system. Please find out what Capitalism really is before you decide to prematurely end it. Thank you.
-
Reply to this comment
-
-
See all 26 Comments >>