FCC approves Net-wiretapping taxes

update WASHINGTON--Broadband providers and Internet phone companies will have to pick up the tab for the cost of building in mandatory wiretap access for police surveillance, federal regulators ruled Wednesday.

The Federal Communications Commission voted unanimously to levy what likely will amount to wiretapping taxes on companies, municipalities and universities, saying it would create an incentive for them to keep costs down and that it was necessary to fight the war on terror. Universities have estimated their cost to be about $7 billion.

ALT TEXT

"The first obligation is...the safety of the people," said FCC Commissioner Michael Copps, a Democrat. "This commission supports efforts to protect the public safety and homeland security of the United States and its people."

Federal police agencies have spent years lobbying for mandatory backdoors for easy surveillance, saying "criminals, terrorists and spies" could cloak their Internet communications with impunity unless centralized wiretapping hubs become mandatory. Last year, the FCC set a deadline of May 14, 2007, for compliance. But universities, libraries and some technology companies have filed suit against the agency, and arguments before a federal court are scheduled for Friday.

"We're going to have a lot of fights over cost reimbursement," Al Gidari, a partner at the law firm of Perkins Coie, who is co-counsel in the lawsuit, said in an interview after the vote. "It continues the lunacy of their prior order and confirms they've learned nothing from what's been filed" in the lawsuit, he said.

The original 1994 law, called the Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act, or CALEA, authorized $500 million to pay telecommunications carriers for the cost of upgrading their networks to facilitate wiretapping. Some broadband and voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) providers had hoped that they'd be reimbursed as well.

Jonathan Askin, general counsel of Pulver.com, likened Wednesday's vote to earlier FCC rules extending 911 regulations to VoIP. "It essentially imposed a mandate on the industry without giving the industry the necessary support to abide by the rules--and the same thing seems to be happening here," Askin said.

Even without the CALEA regulations, police have the legal authority to conduct Internet wiretaps--that's precisely what the FBI's Carnivore system was designed to do. Still, the FBI has argued, the need for "standardized broadband intercept capabilities is especially urgent in light of today's heightened threats to homeland security and the ongoing tendency of criminals to use the most clandestine modes of communication."

The American Council on Education, which represents 1,800 colleges and universities, estimates that the costs of CALEA compliance could total roughly $7 billion for the entire higher-education community, or a tuition hike of $450 for every student in the nation. Documents filed in the lawsuit challenging the FCC's rules put the cost at hundreds of dollars per student.

But during Wednesday's vote, commissioners dismissed those concerns as unfounded. "I am not persuaded merely by largely speculative allegations that the financial burden on the higher-education community could total billions of dollars," said FCC Commissioner Deborah Taylor Tate, a Republican.

The FCC's initial ruling last fall had left open the question of whether broadband and VoIP providers would be reimbursed for rewiring their networks and upgrading equipment to comply with CALEA.

More from News.com on this story's topics

Federal government

Create an email alert | RSS feed

Defense/military

Create an email alert | RSS feed

Education

Create an email alert | RSS feed

Broadband

RSS feed

Networking

Create an email alert | RSS feed

DSL

Create an email alert | RSS feed

Privacy

Create an email alert | RSS feed

See more CNET content tagged:
CALEA, FCC Commissioner, university, vote, broadband

Add a Comment (Log in or register) 48 comments (Page 1 of 3)
wait...
by Amazingant May 3, 2006 11:34 AM PDT
So, the ISPs are going to give the government money so they can start watching what I?m doing? Am I missing something here or are they trying to mess with the privacy of US citizens and make the big companies pay for it?
Reply to this comment View reply
What a good idea...
by umbrae May 3, 2006 11:37 AM PDT
Lets open HUGE privacy holes in broadband access, so idiot FBI agents can wiretap on us without issue. Who cares that everyday hackers will take advantage of this more than the government.

And, of course, end users are fee to pick up the tab as well.
Reply to this comment View all 2 replies
Remember J. Edgar
by Pete Bardo May 3, 2006 12:03 PM PDT
Our government is doing everything they can to make sure our rights as citizens do not extend to the internet. They take one right, one freedom at a time, little by little, until it's all gone.

Welcome to the new world.
Reply to this comment
So much for the Internet Privacy Act.
by mstrhypno May 3, 2006 12:21 PM PDT
It will take the hacker community about twenty minutes to figure
out how to use this gaping hole in internet security.

Thanks, once again, to legislators who are completely clueless
as to how technology functions and wouldn't know the 7-step
model from a 12-step program, our rights as citizens to be
protected from intrusion into our private lives has, once again,
been removed.

Who says reincarnation isn't a fact? Joe McCarthy lives on in the
FCC!

Lee Darrow, C.H.
Chicago, IL
Reply to this comment
Copps out!
by zanzzz May 3, 2006 12:38 PM PDT
"The first obligation is...the safety of the people,". That is the mindset of most politicians post 9/11. The problem is with safety first liberty is last. Democracy is risky business and always will be. The spineless wonders we have elected prove time again their eagerness to trade freedom for the illusion of security. At least these unelected FCC officials are consistent; producing one profoundly misguided ruling after another. Do these bozos really believe wiretapping a voip will catch any terrorists? Clearly most have a higher level of sophistication than openly chatting about operations on a phone or in an unencrypted email. What these government actions amount to in reality is the systematic establishment of a big brother data mining and monitoring apparatus. It seems rather redundant as the NSA has it already in place! I guess those guys don't share with the FBI and police hence the need for a duplicate system.
Reply to this comment
Your Government Your friend
by lazarus_vendetta May 3, 2006 2:01 PM PDT
"If all Americans want is security, they can go to prison, they will have enough to eat, a bed and a roof over thier heads" - Dwight D. Eisenhower 12-8-49. This is so redicoulous. Ever since 9/11 more and more of our freedoms have been taken away. All in the name of "terroism". They can use this excuse to take all our rights, and people will still back them. Its sad really. Maybe we should just call the FBI on three way, it would make it easier for them. "Those who trade their freedoms for security deserve and will reserve niether." Benjamen Franklin.
Reply to this comment View all 2 replies
Lame
by Timmmay May 3, 2006 2:04 PM PDT
Those who give up essential liberties for temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. - Ben Franklin
Reply to this comment
limiting choose
by p.shearer May 3, 2006 2:39 PM PDT
Argggg! it would appear that my only two political chooses are now between fascists or socialists. One wishes to deprive me of financial freedom; the other my personal freedom.
Reply to this comment
1st obligation is the Constitution
by dboy69 May 3, 2006 2:53 PM PDT
Sure seems like the first obligation should be to the constitution.
Reportedly they already have the ability to enable wiretapping...
If US citizens continue to abrogate their rights, we have no one to blame but ourselves. Write and/or call your representatives and let them know this is unacceptable.
Reply to this comment
Sadly
by heystoopid May 3, 2006 3:04 PM PDT
Sadly, we have totally forgotten the reason for the "Boston Tea Party"!

And now , we have to pay an extra impost to allow big brother to bug us all in daily life, truly amazing!, what's next, burn the constitution?

Oh well, there is always the ballot box?, for even a simple ficus tree can do a far better job, then the current house majority!(it can't fall asleep, and is too wooden, to take bribes or free lunches, from the corporate sector!)

Taxes, arbitrarily imposed without representation, are truly evil!!!!!!
Reply to this comment
1 | 2 | 3 | Next 10 Comments >>
Powered by Jive Software
advertisement
RSS Feeds
Add headlines from CNET News.com to your homepage or feedreader.
Google
Yahoo
MSN
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.

Latest tech news headlines

Most Popular Stories
Google's search secret: It gets rid of you
Developer creates copy-paste tech for iPhone
Will Wright on the origins of 'Spore'
Palm Treo Pro: Not digging it
American Airlines launches in-flight Wi-Fi
Markets

Market news, charts, SEC filings, and more

Related quotes

Dow Jones Industrials (0.11%) 12.78 11,430.21
S&P 500 (0.25%) 3.18 1,277.72
NASDAQ (0.00%) 0.00 1,816.15
CNET TECH (-0.11%) -1.71 1,629.09
  Symbol Lookup
advertisement
On GameSpot: Wii Fit tells 10-year-old she's fat
Advanced
search
Advanced
search
Visit other CBS Interactive sites