Unlimited long distance $24.99/mo
February 1, 2006 5:15 AM PST
Perspective: Answering Bush's competition challenge
See all Perspectives
- Related Stories
-
MBA job hunters find Silicon Valley more welcoming
January 10, 2006 -
MIT grads to size up Silicon Valley
January 2, 2006 -
Year in review: Big battles for big talent
December 14, 2005 -
Technology and the new class divide
November 1, 2005 -
Are we getting smarter or dumber?
September 21, 2005 -
Sending Uncle Sam back to school
August 22, 2005 -
Congress calls for paperless health records
July 27, 2005
The House Democrats' "Innovation Agenda" confirms that the issues that need to be focused on are not Republican ideas or Democratic ideas, but American ideas.
So, too, not every good idea on American competitiveness will come from Washington. Governors from both major parties, including Pennsylvania Gov. Ed Rendell, California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, Texas Gov. Rick Perry and North Carolina Gov. Mike Easley, are pursuing pro-job policies that will help American companies compete abroad. Cisco Systems and other leading U.S.-based companies need to get behind these efforts as well.
There are certain areas where some very clear steps can be taken right now to turn words into action:
• Education and research. It is no longer accurate to say America is falling behind on education. We have fallen behind. We are slipping on nearly every international metric on math and science. Congress must ensure that funding for K-12 math and science education is a national priority. And if we prioritize federally sponsored research at universities while making it easier for foreign graduate students to stay in the United States, we will keep the best and brightest here.
• Health care information technology. Technology has transformed industries and society, but the health care industry has been slow to embrace it. The value of health care IT was evident during Hurricane Katrina, when the Veterans Administration was able to use electronic health records to provide continuous care to patients who were transferred hundreds of miles away.
By modernizing our health care system through electronic health records and information sharing, we can improve the quality of health care and cut costs. To do this, Congress must remove the existing regulatory barriers and provide financial incentives for doctors and hospitals to accelerate the adoption of health care IT.
• Interoperability. Government at all levels needs to make sure that our police, firefighters and other first responders have the means to communicate in times of crisis. As the Sept. 11 terror attacks and Hurricane Katrina taught us, we have failed to create a system that works effectively in emergency situations. Congress has already stepped up with the allocation of wireless frequencies dedicated to public safety. But more remains to be done. Starting now, Congress, the executive branch, and state and local governments must insist that dollars directed toward public safety are responsibly used to begin solving the interoperability problem nationally through the power of new technologies.
• Patent litigation reform: At the heart of American innovation is the right of inventors to benefit from their creativity and hard work. Unfortunately, some unscrupulous operators are abusing the system by purchasing patents and then filing nuisance lawsuits. These "patent trolls" are not inventors but opportunists. We must have patent litigation reform to ensure that American innovation continues to flourish while protecting the rights of true inventors.
Those four priorities alone won't ensure the United States keeps its competitive edge, but they are a foundation by which we can keep our economy strong and dynamic. Clearly, broadband deployment and spectrum policy play a large role in the success of these polices and our nation's competitiveness and we must continue to focus on them as well.
It's also not just up to the government to highlight these issues. For too long, the high-tech community has talked about education but not focused on it as a priority. At Cisco, it's something we take seriously.
We know that we have to rethink our approach to education. That is why, after Katrina's devastation on the Gulf Coast, we committed ourselves to rebuilding schools and making them models for 21st century learning.
Starting in Mississippi, Cisco is funding a $40 million program to provide technology, world-class curriculum, process changes and professional development for teachers. The ultimate goal is to use technology to create a new classroom experience where students will find that learning is a way of life. Imagine what would happen if every Fortune 500 company adopted a local region or school system?
Using the bully pulpit as only a president can, George Bush has thrown down the gauntlet on what America needs to do to remain competitive: namely, a good education system, supportive government, focus on innovation and the proper infrastructure. The metrics for success are clear. Now it's a matter of doing it.
Congress must be resolute in embracing these priorities. As a high-tech community, we must put our energy and support behind these efforts.
Biography
John Chambers is president and CEO of Cisco Systems.
See more CNET content tagged:
health care,
Governor,
e-health,
competitiveness,
electronic health record
under the H1-B program, US college students are
avoiding careers in technology.
The idea that we can improve American competitiveness
by spending more money on education is ludicrous
as long as the corporations are allowed to engage
in systematic discrimination against US citizens.
John Chambers and George Bush are both engaged in
?let?s pretend? rhetoric. Instead of actually making
things better, they are talking about the situation
rather than taking action to improve it.
Some people call this "analysis paralysis".
Other people call it things which are unprintable.
I am enthused that at least there is some spoken recognition that our standard of living (at the least) is in danger because our innovation is waning.
I am less enthralled by the word "priority". The concept of priority means that money and effort will have to be diverted from a less important task to one that restores our twentieth century inventiveness. Some folks flew airplanes into buildings in New York City and we as a nation could not even squelch our greedy habits enough to effectively concentrate spending on areas that were most likely for a return visit by our enemies. Our lives are at stake and we treated the enormous funds like the Highway Bill to be doled out according to seniority and geographical area! Are we really going to be able make the hard choices to divert attention from rewarding those who trade services within our borders to those who invent things that the rest of the world will buy?
One of the other reasons I am pessimistic is the tone of other talkbacks to John's important words. We seem so busy passionately and irrationally supporting one political view or another that we ignore the fact that if we don't change, our children are going to be cutting grass for folks from "over there" to whom we have sent our capital for the things they have invented.
I think John Chambers has earned the right to his opinion and that we would be foolish to ignore him.
But one major item has not been discussed-- Stock Option Accounting. Whether you agree or disagree with the new accounting rules, companies like Microsoft, Intel and Cisco were founded on the principals of innovation, risk and reward. Our wonderful politicians folded like a cheap lawn chair when this issue became mainstream which was tainted by all of the corporate governance issues. So we want to be leaders in technology, but took away a tool that has been used to get people to work around the clock for high risk high/high return. Are we really willing to bet the future of this country that the rules will makes us less competitive? Out of touch, or government employees that don't have stock options and work a 9 to 4 job (highly productive) making decisions that will impact this country for many years to come.
Does our wonderful leader (Pres. Bush) even understand the issue? If our government wants to compete with cheaper labor overseas with our US work force that is generally under educated and lazy (why should I do more, what is the incentive to work around the clock etc...), how are they expecting this will happen? By telling us we are not competitive? Oh that will do it-- George says we are lazy so let's work harder. What a joke--
Oh, and if that was not enough, our wonderful government passed the sarbanes oxley bill. Now every company in America can waste all of their resources focusing on internal controls etc.. (most of which were not issues)and spending a whole bunch of money with accounting and law firms instead of increasing R&D funding. Great trade off-- I am sure that Sarbanes Oxley dollars wasted will give the US a big competitive advantage in the near future. What a joke!!!!
If you work for the government and you don't like my comments, too bad. I pay your salary and you are making my job and every american's job harder. So get over it, smell the coffee and get a real job.
america can remain the leader if it wants.the first thing required is concentrate entirely on your agenda.by involving yourself in iraq and afghnistan you have lost weapons,money and more importanly your soldiers.
think over that.
Revolutionary, or at least innovative, solutions for reducing carbon emissions and becoming energy independent should be a major priority of the US government and US corporations if we ever hope to maintain (or perhaps regain) our economic and political leadership.