• On GameSpot: Wii Fit tells 10-year-old she's fat
September 8, 2007 2:13 PM PDT

A call for machine morality

Posted by Stefanie Olsen
  • Font size
  • Print

SAN FRANCISCO--Prediction: We are just a few years away from a catastrophic disaster brought about by an autonomous computer system making a decision--a disaster that will provoke a political response on par with 9/11.

That prediction is from Wendell Wallach, lecturer at Yale University's Interdisciplinary Center for Bioethics, who hypothesized about the challenges and opportunities we face in an age of artificially intelligent machines, such as self-driving cars or household robots. Wallach spoke here Saturday at the Singularity Summit, a two-day conference about AI and the possibility of developing smarter-than-human machines.

"I'm your friendly skeptic. I'm not convinced that we understand enough about intelligence to know whether we can pull this off," he said, referring to computers that can out-think people.

Wallach's specialty is bioethics, so he talked at length about the subject during his speech, "The Road to Singularity: Comedic Complexity, Technological Thresholds, and Bioethical Broad Jumps." Wallach said that we can't underestimate the political power of fear when it comes to research and development of intelligent systems.

"How will this be handled from a public policy approach? Fear's not likely to stop scientific research but it's certainly likely to slow it down," he said. "We need some mechanism for evaluating real potential dangers and (help) leaders and the public to discriminate against what are the real challenges and the speculative ones?"

As a result, a new field of inquiry is emerging, he said. It's referred to by various names, including "machine morality" and robo-ethics, which was coined by people in the European Union. The field, Wallach said, is about coming up with and implementing moral decision-making facilities for artificial agents. Such standards are necessary for a world in which autonomous systems can make choices.

"Computers will have to be explicit reasoners. We must build AI to be sensitive to our moral systems.

"Our intelligence emerges out of emotion and instincts. Computers start as logical platforms and if they have emotions and instincts, it's only because we elect to insert them," he said. "Computers will need "suprarational faculties, not just emotions--they'll need things like social (skills) and a theory of mind," he said.

Wallach acknowledged that concepts like machine morality and rights for robots are speculative. "These are fascinating thought experiments."

Barney Pell, founder of natural language search engine Powerset, added later during a panel: "We can talk about (these things) and no one can prove us wrong for 20 to 30 years."

Recent posts from News Blog
NASA, Google Maps track Southern California wildfires
Sprint first to offer HTC Touch Pro
Flipping out: RIM BlackBerry Pearl Flip 8220 debuts
Sprint HTC Touch Diamond outed early
Woman to virtual ex: 'I won't be ignored!'
Swiss secret sauce to power green choppers
iLink to deliver answers to military online communities
Vonage names new CEO
Add a Comment (Log in or register) 7 comments
Sorry, but hes not a "Skeptic"... He is a Cynic...
by Had_to_be_said September 8, 2007 10:46 PM PDT
Furthermore, the assertions regarding "morality", simply ignores a fundamental philosophical-reality...

Namely...

Either, "morality" is handed-down from some, theoretically, unimpeachable-source (I.E. God, dead-ancestors, super-intelligent space-aliens, etc.)... Or, "morality" is nothing more than a, more or less, random-collection of social-conventions (derived from such sources as, random bits of instinctive-behaviors, and complex, fundamentally-random, long-term social-interactions).

And frankly, based upon the obvious-failures of "morality" throughout history, and enormous differences evidenced by even a cursory-examination of cultural-anthropology... it is quite clear that, so-called, "morality" is both, highly-subjective and (within any actual human-society) provides little, real, long-term benefit to such a society (in anything other than, as an arbitrary-set of often illogical and frequently-ignored, allegedly commonly-accepted, social-edicts).

"Ethics", on the other hand... is a "philosophy" of, hypothetically, reasoned restraints. They are designed to affect some, overall, socially-beneficial end. Primarily, the philosophical under-pinning of "ethics" is that no arbitrary element, or elements, of a society can cause harm to the other elements of a society, solely for their own, exclusive, benefit. This is based upon an empirical, and social, belief that such behavior, inevitably, causes long-term injury to a society as a whole.

In short, "Morality" is a set of, imposed, effectively, generally-arbitrary social-morays. In other words... derived without the need for "rational" processes (it is either "handed-down", or it is randomly-evolved), whereas "Ethics", is a "philosophy" of protecting society from tangible damage, through empirical and "rational" methods. And it is, therefore, based upon "logic" (exactly like modern "AI").

I do not know if this article was simply too full of generalizations to coherently present the true, philosophical-nature, of the original "lecture". However, "Wendell Wallachs" inaccurate assertion that he is a "skeptic" (a philosophy which is founded on reasoned-frameworks, and the requirement for empirical-evidence)... as opposed to a "cynic" (a philosophy based upon a set of general-suppositions regarding the inherently-flawed nature of the universe, and man)... tends to lead me to disregard his assertions, and musings, as fundamentally intellectually-irrelevant. This is especially true in light of his apparent biases, and the unforgivably speculative-nature of his suppositions, and predictions. In my opinion, this can only be due to an obvious lack of understanding of the, actual technical-aspects, within the field of "AI", itself.
Reply to this comment
I agree...
by Zonsb September 9, 2007 12:52 PM PDT
Three principles of a freedom for civilization:

1. No person, group or government shall initiate force, threat of force or fraud against any person, property or contract.

2. It is ethical and moral to use force against any person that violates principle 1.

3. There shill be no exceptions to principle 1 and or 2.

Freedom is a societal condition where 100% of the people have 100% control over 100% of their property 100% of the time. And have zero-percent control over anybody else?s property. Andrew J. Galambos (paraphrase)
View reply
"Sorry"
by spothannah November 3, 2007 2:37 AM PDT
I like what you've said here. I also couldn't tell if the story had accurately reported what the lecturer said or whether the linguistic ambiguities were attributable to the reporter. It does form an interesting moire pattern though.
Microsoft robots will be evil
by t8 September 9, 2007 4:39 PM PDT
Taken from my blog @
http://www.weblogs.co.nz/?p=121

MS assembled robots however would most likely not have ethical programming built into them as Microsoft doesn?t have the skills for anything ethical. Their robots would most likely engage in trying to annihilate their opposition and steal other people?s stuff when given the opportunity. In addition to that, they would be prone to crashing into things, and would pickup all kinds of nasty viruses while engaging in immoral acts. MS robots would only be able to interact with other Microsoft inventions too, including the information super highway, as opposed to the Internet, so they would be very limited.

I think that an open source robot would be much nicer and would be able to interact better with the world.

This is why I think robots in the future should run on open source. Open source is reliable, ethical, cost effective, and open.
Reply to this comment
Evil
by spothannah November 3, 2007 2:25 AM PDT
I guess we should focus, a little bit at least, on the morality of the humans before we worry too much about the morality of the robots that humans creste, huh?
View reply
advertisement

In the news now

Slowing expectations at a green-tech start-up

Six months ago, biofuels start-up Mascoma had the wind in its sails, as did the rest of the clean-tech sector. Now, the company is treading carefully and scaling back.


With JavaFX, Sun seeks new coders, new revenue

With the launch of JavaFX 1.0, Sun is trying to reclaim Java's strength as a foundation for rich Internet applications. But it's no longer the incumbent.


Tim Lincecum, motion capture star

San Francisco Giants pitcher, who won the Cy Young award last month, dons a motion capture suit for 2K Sports' Major League Baseball 2K9 video game.


About News Blog

Recent posts on technology, trends, and more.

Add this feed to your online news reader

News Blog topics

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right