Is the Skype outage really a big deal?
Skype's service appears to be up and running again for the most part, after software issues Thursday prevented millions of Skype users from signing on to the IP telephony application.

Skype officials say the outage was not due to a cyberattack or network upgrades. Instead they attributed the issue to "a deficiency in an algorithm within Skype networking software. This controls the interaction between the user's own Skype client and the rest of the Skype network."
As of 11 a.m. GMT Friday, the company said that the software had started to stabilize. Some users have reported spotty service, but when I tried the service earlier today, it worked just fine.
Pundits and bloggers are already lining up to take swipes at Skype, which is owned by eBay. Some say the service hiccup could hurt the company's reputation and potentially cost them users.
But I disagree. It was one outage that lasted less than 24 hours. I'm sure it inconvenienced some people. But I'm guessing that most of the 220 million registered Skype users didn't even notice. Why? Well for one, most of them don't rely on Skype as their only form of voice communications.
And the reason is simple. Skype or any other PC-based voice over IP application still isn't as reliable or convenient to use as a traditional landline phone or a cell phone. And most people get that. Skype augments their other communications. It doesn't replace it.
Take me as an example. I'm an avid Skype user. I use the service mostly to chat with my friends in Europe. I have a regular phone line at home, a work phone and a cell phone. So Skype isn't the only means by which I can make phone calls. I use it mostly because it's cheap to make international calls. And if I'm on my computer, it's convenient./p>
But I've noticed that even when Skype isn't having a widescale issue with its software algorithms, I often have to call and then disconnect two or three times before I get a clear connection. While I'll admit this can get annoying, it doesn't bother me too much for two reasons. One, when the call does connect, the call quality is often way better than I get on my cell phone.
And secondly, most of the Skype calls I make are to other people using the Skype application, so it's free. And I have a different tolerance for quality and reliability when something is free. (On the other hand, I get really annoyed when I can't get a cell phone signal or my signal drops, because I'm paying $50 a month for the service.)
I don't think I'm the only person who feels this way. Skype has never marketed itself as a replacement phone service. And that seems to have been a smart strategy. Because Skype doesn't encourage people to disconnect their existing phone lines or quit their current wireless service, the company knows that people won't have to rely on its service. That is one of the main reasons the company doesn't have to comply with the Federal Communications Commission's E-911 mandates. In general, the expectation for Skype and other PC-based telephony services is lower.
By contrast, Vonage, the other big name in VoIP, set the bar high in terms of expectations. The company marketed itself as a replacement to existing home phones. And as a result, it had to deal with all the headaches of complying with E-911 and other FCC requirements.
A quick look at the subscriber numbers helps paint a picture of which strategy seems to be working. Vonage, which is in a legal tussle with Verizon over patents, has been losing customers with its most recent total at about 2.45 million monthly subscribers. Skype says it has 220 million registered users worldwide.
I think the fact that the Skype outage even stirred a buzz is a testament to the success of the application. And I find it really hard to believe that some 220 million folks are going to delete the Skype application from their desktops just because of one service outage. Then again, I also didn't believe that millions of corporate BlackBerry users would ditch Research in Motion's service when the company experienced an overnight outage just a few months ago.
- Tags:
-
Skype,
-
VoIP,
-
voice over IP,
-
Vonage,
-
outage
- Bookmark:
- Digg
- Del.icio.us







As a website developer, I work for a company in which the entire staff works from home and relies on Skype as our primary means of communcation with each other and our clients, so this has been more than a little annoying.
since the service is down, we are approaching 48 hours since no
service available!
And yes, I will be one of those who will delete the Skype application
from my hard disk. I downloaded today Gizmo and will probably
stay with it... it's only a matter of bringing everybody on Gismo. I
doubt Skype will ever recover...
Problem? Yes. Big problem? Perhaps.
Me and all my colleagues have all grown somewhat 'attached' to SKYPE and were recently beginning to use it for calls. I got a few of my friends and my girlfriend to download skype on their home PC's and we all have it on our smartphones.
So in a nutshell: SKYPE has been blossoming since the owners of our up and coming financial company said we're using it. And if come Monday morning there's still issues; guess what? We probably won't use it anymore. And that's about 75 people. So if there's more stories like mine; then yes; this can be a very big deal.
the ones that ONLY use Skype for business communications, but
then again, why would any person in their right mind put all
their eggs in one basket when it comes to voice communication?
Most people in businesses have cell phones, and use their office
line when they are in the office. If Skype goes down, than you
should have a cell phone to fall back on.
As for other posters complaints regarding using Skype for
interoffice communication I find it hard to believe you would
work in an office where you didn't have phones capable of
conference calls, or an application such as iChat, which allows
for video and voice conference calls over a local network.
It seems to me that the only thing that this Skype outage
showed us is how unprepared people are and a complete lack of
foresight, especially with free services.
of the deficiencies of the Mac verson of Skype. Surely it is the
clumsiest, most incompetently designed, Mac software which
has ever been in wide use. I suspect it is designed by a nihilist
cult opposed to reason, logic, and elegance. Or maybe it is a test
of human tolerance for bewilderment. Barely a click on Skype
fails to leave the user contemplating, "What could the designers
have been thinking?" In dozens of little ways, ranging from
having to reopen the full window to duplicate a user search to
not being able to modify an existing contact, Skype announces,
"Yes, it is possible to do damned near everything badly." If there
are Skype beta testers they must be a confederacy of dunces.
Skype is the software Chernobyl.
I do feel for these poor skype developers, though. Cannot image how much pressure they are getting now... and someone will loose their job after this.
KieranMullen
http://360oregon.com
My company is completely virtual. We have developers throughout the US and Europe. Skype is the backbone of our communication. We've been fortunate that during this time there haven't been any major emergencies with the company that required the services of anybody else in the company. In an emergency, I use Skype to determine who is still working--who I can contact to fix problems that I'm unable to fix.
Oh, and as of 21:45 GMT, still no Skype. It's been nearly 36 hours without Skype. Two months ago I nearly dumped Vonage for Skype. Boy am I glad I didn't!
yesterday's outage the spinning icon in the system tray used up
so many sessions with outgoing traffic that I could not access
the internet at all. I could still use Outlook and ping
intermittently to the outside world, but the persistent attempts
by the Skype software to connect to Skype's servers was such a
huge drain on my system resources. It wasn't until after
spending time on the phone with my DSL provider, my network
manager and my systems people all of whom were concerned
that I might have an agent or bot of some sort on my computer
that we tried disabling Skype and all of a sudden my sessions
dropped from over 300 to sub 100 and all was well with the
world and I could access the internet. Today, when I saw that
Skype was still trying to connect when I started up my computer
and I was again unable to access the internet, I simply disabled
it and was free to surf to my hearts content. I know a couple of
others who have told me they had similar issues but were not
able to work out why they couldn't access a web page yet were
able to receive email. I think it is something to do with the
consistency of the packet transfers, although I'm not a tech.
As a final note, I've been a Vonage customer at home for almost
3 years now and with the exception of the first couple of months
have never had a problem. The service is impeccable - perhaps
people try to tweak it and don't give it enough bandwidth, or
they are using it with connections that are too slow. While it
can't match Skype for price, for my $25 a month it is infinitely
superior for home use.
pointing out that they provide every feature of a phone company
but dont want to be considered a "replacement service" because
then they would have to pay taxes and abide by E911 laws?
Massive massive catastrophe happens on their system
highlighting the core reason that p2p is less reliable than a
hosted solution.
They immediately pull out the PR machine and have some cnet
blogger write up a "it doesnt matter dude" article.
Two days of spotty service isn't enough to make me want to drop Skype but it's unbelievable that anyone could write or publish an article that claims this kind of service outage isn't a big deal.
http://mike-mcgrath.wordpress.com/2007/08/18/skype-says-im-back/
http://mike-mcgrath.wordpress.com/2007/08/16/skypeless-certainly-and-helpless-almost/
- A big deal or "quick to go" frustration
-
by jowewo
August 19, 2007 11:06 AM PDT
- Skype is a great piece of software. From chat to payment, from
-
Reply to this comment
-
-
See all 30 Comments >>sharing to PC2PC/regular phone communication from fun to
work, it has become an amazing tool without losing its ease to
use and it's stability. What a frustration when we were not able
to use it for 24 hours! But at the same time, let's look at the big
picture. Comcast or AT&T users are known to have service
interruption very frequently: do we hear about the issue then?
No! Any computer/web-based system is bound to run into a
problem once in a while. Using Skype for over 4 years, this is
the first time we encounter a "major" outage. Breeze in/breeze
out... Everything is going to be OK. I personally refuse to follow
those who want to scare us away. I will continue to use Skype
with confidence and will always prefer it over M$N, Yahoo and
other "junked-with-ad" messengers... Skype is good for you...
Give it a shot!