• On MovieTome: Leaked images from TRANSFORMERS 2?
May 31, 2007 2:32 PM PDT

'Second Life' publisher must go to court in property case

A property case against Second Life publisher Linden Lab filed in a Pennsylvania court will not be dismissed, a judge ruled Wednesday, according to Valleywag.

The case, which was filed May 1, 2006 by Pennsylvania attorney Mark Bragg, alleges that Linden Lab illegitimately took away the items in Bragg's account and banned him from Second Life after he used a cheat to build up his in-world inventory of virtual items in the process of amassing thousand dollars' worth of assets.

Now, Valleywag reports, the court has denied (click here for PDF) Linden Lab's request to dismiss the case, as well as its request to move the case to arbitration.

Many people are watching this case closely, because it represents the first virtual-world property dispute to make it this far in a legal proceeding. If the eventual result is a ruling that Linden Lab has to give back the property, valued at around $8,000, it could have major implications for Linden Lab and makers of online games like World of Warcraft and many others.

Daniel Terdiman is a staff writer at CNET News covering games, Net culture, and everything in between. E-mail Daniel.
Recent posts from News Blog
Navy charters kite-powered cargo ship to deliver equipment
EA Mobile, Eidos Interactive sign agreement
Sprint first to offer HTC Touch Pro
Flipping out: RIM BlackBerry Pearl Flip 8220 debuts
Sprint HTC Touch Diamond outed early
Add a Comment (Log in or register) 2 comments
Details Details
by csven May 31, 2007 3:57 PM PDT
Could this line - "after he used a cheat to build up his in-world inventory of virtual items" - be any less accurate???

As I watched this unfold on the SL forums, what I recall is that the guy just accessed an auction webpage by typing in a URL.

- It *shouldn't* have been accessible because the auction hadn't begun, but it was.

- He *shouldn't* have taken advantage of this back door, but he did.

- Linden Lab *shouldn't* have accepted the bid(s) and taken his money, but they did.

- And after realizing their new auction system wasn't ready for primetime, they shouldn't have stripped his virtual assets, banned him, AND kept his money, but iirc that's exactly what they did because their ToS said they could.

And that, if I'm not mistaken, is closer to the truth of what happened.
Reply to this comment View reply
Powered by Jive Software
advertisement
Resource center from News.com sponsors
You Need The Speed of Norton 2009
Introducing Norton Internet Security™2009

Click Here!
With one-click, one-minute install, under 8MB of memory usage and fewer, shorter scans, it's the fastest security suite anywhere. Norton. Smart Security, Engineered for Speed. Get a FREE trial today!

Click Here!
The Fastest Security Suite Anywhere

Experience the revolutionary Norton Internet Security™ 2009. With Norton™ Insight, a new feature, you get precision security that targets only at risk files for fewer, faster, shorter scans

Win a Trip to Space!*

Enter the Blast Off with Norton Sweepstakes for your shot at a trip to space. You could experience being fast and weightless, just like the new Norton 2009. *No purchase necessary; click for full details.

FREE Trial!

Act now to get your FREE trial of Norton Internet Security 2009. Try it for the protection. Love it for the speed

Norton Safe Web NEW!

A community-based system that rates web site safety

Norton Labs NEW!

Users can download new security technologies and share input directly with developers. Help us shape our future products!

About News Blog

Recent posts on technology, trends, and more.

Add this feed to your online news reader

News Blog topics

Featured blogs

advertisement
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right