May 11, 2007 10:43 AM PDT

New top-level domains could arrive by mid-2008, ICANN says

New top-level domains are once again on the horizon.

ICANN, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, said on Thursday that it would begin accepting applications for new suffixes early next year.

The problem, though, is that new top-level domains aren't necessarily going to be that useful or interesting.

The venerable .com suffix still remains the Internet's prime real estate, and ones like .info and .biz seem to have become more used by spammers than legitimate businesses. ICANN's final rejection of .xxx this year, even there was no technical or legal reason not to approve it, has severely politicized the process. Instead of using .museum, the world's most famous ones go by louvre.fr, museumoflondon.org.uk, and metmuseum.org. And so on.

Still, ICANN is going ahead. "If the new approval process comes on-line as planned, the global Internet could see new top-level domains added and available between June and August 2008," ICANN president Paul Twomey said in a statement.

Expect more details at ICANN's meeting in June in Puerto Rico.

Recent posts from News Blog
Sprint HTC Touch Diamond outed early
Woman to virtual ex: 'I won't be ignored!'
Swiss secret sauce to power green choppers
iLink to deliver answers to military online communities
Vonage names new CEO
Add a Comment (Log in or register) 2 comments
it still works
by Dalkorian May 11, 2007 2:42 PM PDT
From Declan's article:

"Instead of using .museum, the world's most famous ones go by
louvre.fr, museumoflondon.org.uk, and metmuseum.org."

They may not have changed all their advertising to reflect the
newer domain, but they're all using it.

--------------------
$ dig louvre.museum

; <<>> DiG 9.2.0 <<>> louvre.museum
;; global options: printcmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 23596
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 5,
ADDITIONAL: 1

;; QUESTION SECTION:
;louvre.museum. IN A

;; ANSWER SECTION:
louvre.museum. 86400 IN A 160.92.103.98

;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
museum. 86400 IN NS nic.museum.
museum. 86400 IN NS ns1.getty.edu.
museum. 86400 IN NS ns-ext.vix.com.
museum. 86400 IN NS ns.icann.org.
museum. 86400 IN NS nic.icom.org.

;; ADDITIONAL SECTION:
ns-ext.vix.com. 126857 IN A 204.152.184.64

;; Query time: 71 msec
;; SERVER: 206.13.29.12#53(206.13.29.12)
;; WHEN: Fri May 11 14:30:47 2007
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 185

$ dig museumoflondon.museum

; <<>> DiG 9.2.0 <<>> museumoflondon.museum
;; global options: printcmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 24569
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 5,
ADDITIONAL: 1

;; QUESTION SECTION:
;museumoflondon.museum. IN A

;; ANSWER SECTION:
museumoflondon.museum. 180 IN A 195.7.77.20

;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
museum. 86335 IN NS nic.icom.org.
museum. 86335 IN NS nic.museum.
museum. 86335 IN NS ns1.getty.edu.
museum. 86335 IN NS ns-ext.vix.com.
museum. 86335 IN NS ns.icann.org.

;; ADDITIONAL SECTION:
ns.icann.org. 143457 IN A 192.0.34.126

;; Query time: 218 msec
;; SERVER: 192.168.12.200#53(192.168.12.200)
;; WHEN: Fri May 11 14:31:53 2007
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 193

$ dig metmuseum.museum

; <<>> DiG 9.2.0 <<>> metmuseum.museum
;; global options: printcmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 26166
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 5,
ADDITIONAL: 1

;; QUESTION SECTION:
;metmuseum.museum. IN A

;; ANSWER SECTION:
metmuseum.museum. 180 IN A 195.7.77.20

;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
museum. 86323 IN NS nic.museum.
museum. 86323 IN NS ns1.getty.edu.
museum. 86323 IN NS ns-ext.vix.com.
museum. 86323 IN NS ns.icann.org.
museum. 86323 IN NS nic.icom.org.

;; ADDITIONAL SECTION:
ns.icann.org. 143445 IN A 192.0.34.126

;; Query time: 196 msec
;; SERVER: 192.168.12.200#53(192.168.12.200)
;; WHEN: Fri May 11 14:32:05 2007
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 188

$
--------------------

As for the .xxx domain comment, it would have ended up being
pretty useless anyway, wouldn't it? You can't *FORCE* all the
'pron' onto that domain, can you? If not, what would have been
the point? "pornsite.com" might likely register "pornsite.xxx" to
'be in the club', but I doubt they would give up the .com domain
for it. Either way, it's doubtful that "shadypornsite.com" would
voluntarily register a .xxx domain because they would realize
that it's easy to filter out an entire domain like .xxx!
Reply to this comment
.bank?
by sjkx May 11, 2007 3:33 PM PDT
I wonder if .bank (or similar) might be one of the new TLDs.
Reply to this comment
Powered by Jive Software
advertisement

Latest tech news headlines

About News Blog

Recent posts on technology, trends, and more.

Add this feed to your online news reader

News Blog topics

Featured blogs

advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right
  • News - Business Tech

    Samsung contemplating SanDisk acquisition

    South Korean consumer electronics giant is considering a buyout of the chipmaker to reduce its NAND flash memory costs, according to PaidContent.

  • Gallery

    Photos: Ron Paul's RNC alternative

    As the Republican convention took place just miles away, a crowd rallied for the former presidential candidate and his message of limited government, ensured civil liberties, lower taxes, and peace.

  • The Open Road

    Analysts as a lagging indicator of success

    Gartner, Forrester, and other analyst firms tend to be great predictors of the past, probably because that's where they get their money.

  • Beyond Binary

    Microsoft adding to its Labs collection

    Startup Labs will be an effort under Ray Ozzie, joining others including Live Labs, adCenter Labs, and Office Labs.

  • Video

    YouTube plays party politics

    During the presidential campaigning four years ago, YouTube didn't even exist. Now it's a tool candidates must master to get their message across. CNET's Kara Tsuboi stops by the YouTube upload booths at the Democratic and Republican conventions to find out why Google's video site has such a big presence in Denver and St. Paul, Minn.

  • News - Digital Media

    Week in review: Google's Chrome shines

    Web giant makes long-awaited foray into browser market, while the mobile market warms up. Also: Tech goes to Republican National Convention.

  • Video

    Political party playlists

    We know the Democrats and Republicans are split over policy issues, but does their musical taste fall down party lines too? And what kind of gadgets did they bring to the conventions to listen to their music? CNET reporter Kara Tsuboi finds out.

  • News - Gaming and Culture

    Are Demo and TechCrunch50 fragmenting their audiences?

    With both events scheduled to start Monday, many press, as well as venture capitalists and others are having to choose which one to attend.

  • News - Cutting Edge

    Execs predict next Google-like tech

    On eve of company's 10-year anniversary, researchers and business pundits speculate about what technologies might someday have as much impact as Google.

  • Gallery

    Photos: The brains behind Google Chrome

    Here's a look at some of the engineers and executives who took the stage at the company's headquarters as they unveiled the new browser.

  • Webware

    Hands-on with the new Joost: Software still required

    The new Joost is no longer a piece of software, but you'll still need a special site-specific plug-in to run it.

  • Green Tech

    Duke Energy to invest in mini solar power plants

    Can hundreds of rooftop solar panels collectively operate like a central power plant? Duke Energy launches $100 million distributed solar program to find out.