• On TV.com: THE GIRLS NEXT DOOR photos
July 28, 2008 10:58 AM PDT

Yahoo Music to offer refunds, what about MSN?

Posted by Greg Sandoval
  • Font size
  • Print

Yahoo Music is offering refunds to anyone who bought songs from the service. Is it time for MSN Music follow Yahoo's lead?

Yahoo announced last week that it would no longer issue authorization keys for the digital rights management, or DRM, software on its songs. This meant that anyone who bought songs from the service would still be able to hear their songs through its service but would be unable to move them to other devices or computers.

This did not play well with Web users. Now Yahoo Music plans to issue refunds and is trying to go one step further. If a customer would prefer music over a refund, Yahoo is looking for a way to give the customer copies of the purchased songs in the DRM-free MP3 format, according to a Yahoo representative.

Yahoo Music is transferring customers of Yahoo Music Unlimited to RealNetworks' Rhapsody service. These are both subscription music services, so Yahoo users who choose to make the move are unaffected. But those who purchased songs would be out of luck after September 30.

The question now is, has Yahoo Music raised the bar? Is it time for Microsoft to pony up with a refund for MSN users?

MSN Music shut down and announced that it would stop issuing DRM keys, only to change its mind last month and say it would continue issuing keys for another three years. As noted by Michael Spiegelman, Yahoo's senior director of music, Microsoft just delayed the withdrawing of support for songs.

A Microsoft representative could not be immediately reached.

The Electronic Frontier Foundation, an advocacy group for Internet users, has called on both Yahoo and MSN to issue refunds.

Greg Sandoval covers media and digital entertainment for CNET News. He is a former reporter for The Washington Post and the Los Angeles Times. E-mail Greg.
Recent posts from Digital Media
Report: Conde Nast putting site launches on hold
Facebook delays plan to let employees sell stock
Icahn goes bargain basement hunting
Some Xbox owners see poor-quality Netflix streams
In Flickr's mobile upgrade, video!
Report: IAC may sell smaller businesses
Viacom lays off 7 percent of workforce
Icahn against partial-sale bid for Yahoo
Add a Comment (Log in or register) 20 comments
by Calisurfer July 28, 2008 11:22 AM PDT
Well that's something else! I always found it useful, never bought songs yet, but I was hoping to see if I could use it to find songs for my phone. Well I guess we'll just have to stick to the free ringtones on The Hotel Cafe
Reply to this comment
by catch23 July 28, 2008 11:47 AM PDT
Wonder what is going to happen when Apple, at some future point, stops authorizing machines? That should be fun.
Reply to this comment
by Renegade Knight July 28, 2008 12:03 PM PDT
I've used up most of my iTunes authorizations for some free songs I got as part of a promotion. I don't even use iTunes. Had I been an iTunes fan I would have long ago ran out of the limited authorizations they give and that would have been that.

I think I burned a CD of them and ripped them to solve the problem. Now I'll just hang on to the CD and drop the DRM digital part. Less work for me to track.
by Penguinisto July 28, 2008 2:23 PM PDT
That's easy - use iTunes to rip 'em in batches to .wav, then convert them into whatever format you want. iTunes lets you do this within its own app.

Otherwise, it would be trivial for Apple to issue a patch that unlocks everything anyway.
by domenick500 July 28, 2008 4:11 PM PDT
apple will probably continue to be successful for along time and when they do stop the will probably have an answer
by kelmon July 29, 2008 2:04 AM PDT
Well, this doesn't just apply to Apple. Apple has the lion's share when it comes to the music market but not so much when it comes to video and video is likely to maintain DRM longer than music will. The likelihood that Apple will get out of the music market soon is low given their position and, should that ever happen, let's hope that the record labels have stopped being petty and allows the rest of Apple's catalog to be sold DRM-free.

Losing the DRM restrictions via burning to CD really isn't a good option since the CD won't improve the recording quality of the original file and importing it again will result in either a much bigger file (if using a lossless codec) or a worse recording (if using a lossy codec).
by sparrowhyperion July 28, 2008 12:16 PM PDT
These big companies crack me up. They put draconian DRM in their music downloads, then stop issuing keys. At least Yahoo is trying to be fair about it. This kind of hassle is why so many people get sick of dealing with music bought on subscription services and instead DL music in MP2 format illegally. These companies have no right to whine when their stifling policies are one of the major cause of the problem of illegal music downloading. They have an awfully weird concept of fair use. It's like buying a book at a web bookstore and then being only able to read that book in the house you were sitting in when you bought it and only under a pre approved reading lamp. WAKE UP RIAA! You can sue folks who will never be able to pay you for years, acquiring enormous legal bills that you are going to end up paying. And the only outcome is going to be bad press for you, lost time and money and negligible results in actually putting a dent in online music downloading. You need a reality check...
Reply to this comment
by Zen-Masta July 28, 2008 12:16 PM PDT
The issue is only relevant because yahoo music and msn music are closed/closing. iTunes isn't going out of business anytime soon so this issue wont rear its heard for a long time.
Reply to this comment
by angeljeanne July 28, 2008 2:14 PM PDT
I know this is going to sound stupid but what happeed to the so called "Copy Right laws"? I remember the sixties with rock and roll and all that went on with great groups of like the supremes, and all that never were given dredit for what they wrote and sang. Gee maybe I am just confused or have gooten the wrong information. Can someone correct me or tell me I am thinking wrong or what?! thanks Jeanne
Reply to this comment
by JCPayne July 28, 2008 4:56 PM PDT
To angeljeanne:

Yup look up the "DMCA" a.k.a the "Digital Millennium Copyright Act"....

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Millennium_Copyright_Act

It changed the whole way Copyright law is carried out for you all in the United States. Brazil's on the other hand is sweet. It
Reply to this comment
by shahnyboy July 28, 2008 5:56 PM PDT
I started buying my music off Amazon soon after i found out how restricted my iTunes songs were.
Glad to know yahoo is taking notice of this nonsense.

I understand the piracy problem but honest, paying customers shouldn't suffer.
Reply to this comment
by Nighteye19 July 28, 2008 7:14 PM PDT
You are right. Paying customers shouldn't suffer. But, what the music industry really wants is paying customers that pay, pay again, pay again, pay again, and pay again for the same song.
Reply to this comment
by BCF1968 July 29, 2008 12:52 AM PDT
So someone that say bought a Rolling Stones LP in the 1960's should have gotten the 8-track for free, the cassette for free, the CD for free and a Mp3 version for free and free version of any other medium that comes out in the future because they paid for the music 40 years ago?
by crookedtoez July 28, 2008 9:07 PM PDT
ever heard of limewire!
Reply to this comment
by AppleSuxLeo July 29, 2008 12:05 AM PDT
I always did like the smiling yellow head icon...Good Yahoo !
Reply to this comment
by kelmon July 29, 2008 2:08 AM PDT
Well done Yahoo! for taking the correct action. MSN's current attitude is indefensible and I can only hope that Yahoo!'s policy will make MSN re-evaluate their own. Given that neither stores had much in the way of customers a compensation policy won't cost that much.
Reply to this comment
by jypeterson July 29, 2008 5:04 AM PDT
What everyone here is forgetting that Yahoo, MSN, and even iTunes are not the ones behind DRM. These companies are merely retailers abiding by the packaging rules set by the producers of the product. The record lables required all of the retailers to wrap the music in DRM to protect their own interests, not the consumer.

The only reason why Amazon has DRM free music is because of Job's pressure on the record lables. The labels realize that there will be narrowing choices for music online since the only ecosystem that is easy to use from end to end is Apple's solution. All of the others failed to live up to consumers' expectations, and therefore have fallen by the wayside and closed up shop.

As soon as the labels open all of their music in all of their stores, consumers will continue to suffer with the draconian DRM rules.
Reply to this comment
by yudansha July 31, 2008 9:28 AM PDT
I have not seen any evidence that Yahoo really is offering a refund. The only place this idea even appears is here at cNet, but there is no link or anything. As someone who purchased a number of songs and albums from Yahoo Music Unlimited, I would certainly be interestd in finding that this is true. So far, though, this appears to be just a cNet-started rumor.
Reply to this comment
by yudansha August 1, 2008 8:55 AM PDT
Following up on my comment from yesterday, I contacted Yahoo Music Unlimited, both through the burnable download billing help contact and through general Yahoo Music Unlimited help contact, and posed a simple question:

"How do I secure a refund for the songs and
albums I purchased from Yahoo Music Unlimited?
Thank you."

Just so you know, they make you sign in and confirm your birthdate and other information before even allowing you to pose a question to billing help, and they even ask permission to access your billing records, which I gave.

Nonetheless, here's the response to my rather straightforward question about refunds for burnable downloads:
--
"Hello [],
"Thank you for writing to Yahoo! Music Unlimited. It will try to resolve this for you as soon as possible. Unfortunately, there was not enough information in your email for us to provide you with a detailed answer. If you still need assistance, please write back to us explaining the exact issue that you are concerned with so that we can assist you as soon as possible.
"We look forard to your prompt reply.
"Thank you for contacting us about your concern.
"Regards,
"Roger"
--
So, if they are indeed offering refunds, noone told "Roger" in billing.
Yahoo does seem to be suffering some rather serious problems across the brand. I wonder if we are witnessing the end of was once a great company?

I will update if and when I ever actually get a refund. But I'm not holding my breath. Thumbs down on Yahoo!
Reply to this comment
by cmwillman August 10, 2008 9:32 AM PDT
Yahoo raising the bar? Have you *tried* to get a refund? I was charged $149 for yahoo unlimited and have exhausted every effort to receive a refund for this defunct service. There's no customer service number and there's no way to cancel. Yahoo has LOWERED the bar in customer service if you ask me.
-CMWillman
Reply to this comment
advertisement

In the news now

Slowing expectations at a green-tech start-up

Six months ago, biofuels start-up Mascoma had the wind in its sails, as did the rest of the clean-tech sector. Now, the company is treading carefully and scaling back.


With JavaFX, Sun seeks new coders, new revenue

With the launch of JavaFX 1.0, Sun is trying to reclaim Java's strength as a foundation for rich Internet applications. But it's no longer the incumbent.


Tim Lincecum, motion capture star

San Francisco Giants pitcher, who won the Cy Young award last month, dons a motion capture suit for 2K Sports' Major League Baseball 2K9 video game.


About Digital Media

The Web is now the place to go for news and entertainment. Look here for the latest on blogs, music, video, virtual worlds, social networking and more.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Digital Media topics

advertisement
advertisement
Click Here

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right