• On TV.com: CLEVELAND SHOW delayed until Fall 2009

April 12, 2006 12:17 PM PDT

Alleged NASA hacker to hear fate next month

  • Print
LONDON--A British former systems administrator who faces extradition to the U.S. if convicted of hacking American military computers will learn his fate next month.

Gary McKinnon appeared in court in London on Wednesday, in the latest stage in a protracted legal process. His defense has argued that he should not be extradited, as he could be tried under the tough antiterrorism laws in the U.S., sent to Guantanamo Bay and imprisoned for up to 60 years.

On Wednesday, the prosecution produced an unsigned note from the U.S. Embassy, which they claimed was a guarantee that McKinnon would not be tried under Military Order No. 1, which allows suspected terrorists to be tried under military law.

However, the defense argued that the note was not signed and therefore not binding. The defense called Clive Stafford-Smith, a U.S. lawyer who has defended Guantanamo Bay inmates, as a witness. Stafford-Smith argued that the note would not prevent McKinnon from being treated as a terrorist.

"(U.S. President Bush) has a very strong view that he has legislative authority that is not trammeled by the legislature," Stafford-Smith said.

McKinnon also indicated that he wasn't convinced that the unsigned note would protect him. "It's not worth the paper it's written on," he said outside the court.

The case was adjourned until May 10, when a final decision will be made on whether McKinnon can be extradited.

McKinnon is charged with illegally accessing 97 U.S. government computers, run by NASA and the U.S. military, and causing $700,000 worth of damage over a 12-month period starting in February 2001.

McKinnon, from North London, has admitted that he accessed some U.S. military computers, but has denied causing serious damage. The UFO enthusiast has claimed that he was searching through government systems for evidence of extraterrestrial life.

Tom Espiner of ZDNet UK reported from London.

See more CNET content tagged:
fate, defense, hacking, note, London

Add a Comment (Log in or register) 20 comments
Terrorist? Whatever!
by Dave_Brown April 12, 2006 1:24 PM PDT
Ok so the US Government thinks this guy is a terrorist? Give me a break. Since when is hacking considered terrorism? What if he hacked Amazon, Yahoo or Ebay would he also be considered a terrorist? 60 years in Guantanamo seems a tad excessive. Have him pay the money back and maybe go to civilian prison for a few years, but Guantanamo, come on!
Reply to this comment
Bad comparisons
by April 12, 2006 1:48 PM PDT
Your comparing hacking a e-commerce site to hacking a government sanctioned network with top-secret information. Do you really think that they're the same?! ***...

Please, do us all a favor and just unplug your computer and throw it out the window. That is the worst comparison I've ever heard.
View all 3 replies
Hack Amazon?????
by Gorthax April 12, 2006 1:53 PM PDT
You twit, Amazon or the like do not house sensitive national documents.... This moron should end up in Guantanamo... What gives this jackass the immunity to play with systems which may supervise serious orbital / navigational, or even icbm defense systems? How the hell do you compare a commercial entity to an entity embedded in National Security. I agree there may be "some" type of information in "some" system that "someone" may be able to have "someone" else interpret as "somekind" of proof that ther may be "some" other life "somewhere" When this idiot knowingly accessed US government computers sans authorization he knew what was going to happen, If he was intelligent enough to gain access, He should have been smart enough to know why NOT to carry through...Twit
View reply
Only 60 years?
by Jackson Cracker April 12, 2006 1:34 PM PDT
With the "Patriot" act now being permanent, the US
"war on terror" is also officially permanent. So he
could probably be held in Guantanamo or in one of
the secret eastern European prisons for life without
being charged.
Reply to this comment
Human Rights
by n3td3v April 12, 2006 8:23 PM PDT
George W Bush and his merry men don't know the definition of FREEDOM and HUMAN RIGHTS.
View reply
Terrorist my eye.
by JFDMit April 12, 2006 4:09 PM PDT
While there will always be some rabid freeper halfwits who want to stick everyone who jaywalks in Gitmo for life, what they fail to realise is that, while they're busy trying to deny everyone else's basic rights, they're destroying their own as well.

This hacker did what hundreds have done before and few of them got more than slaps on the wrist or short prison sentences and fines. Now, because of the phony 'War on Terror' (which has been such a success so far - Osama bin who?), the government thinks it can fool us into believing it's got a grip on the situation by throwing a few soft targets in jail for life.

The sooner the Bushbots realise they've been had for the past five years and start working to restore the foundations of due process and justice upon which America was found, the better it will be for us all.

Or do we have to wait for the Chimperor to nuke Iran before the message gets across?
Reply to this comment
Bush...Good for planting, NOT as a leader!
by AECRADIO April 19, 2006 4:43 PM PDT
SOMEONE UNDERSTANDS!!

Facinating to see that there are people with brains and personal intelligence that does not fall for the same old lies as king george creates.

How many people must die or rot in Gitmo before the people DEMAND our leaders follow the law and OUR orders?

This is not a nation run by dictators(yet), but if something isn't done soon, it will be as it's only a matter of time before voting is restricted or denied to all.

The more people that sit in prison, the less are 'allowed' to vote, and EVERYBODY has the RIGHT TO VOTE, this is NOT a privilege as bush assumes it is, and it can NOT be denied either!

How can anybody blindly trust this moron that made the claim that the constitution is just a G** D****D piece of paper???

That surely sounds of TREASON to me, especially since he MUST take the OATH of ofice BEFORE he can be president, his remark should have set off alarms nationwide then, and he should be rotting in prison for the same 60 years, like he loves to do to others!

When he swore to uphold and defend the constitution, this meant for his entire term, and not only for the length of time it took to be sworn in.

George MUST be placed in prison for his CRIMES against the U.S.A.

Usurpation of ANY rights retained by the people, by any branch of government MUST be punished with LIFE IN PRISON for TREASON!

Nothing less will suffice!

DON'T TREAD ON ME!
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^<---Was that NOT the battle cry for FREEDOM once?

Let's make certain the government NEVER treads on OUR rights or freedoms, it never had the power to do so, nor was it ever granted total power over the people, but after 9/11, we allowed our government to lie cheat and steal from us on a whim, and it has cost US livess because of it!

The line must be drawn HERE!
This far, NO FARTHER!

Our own government's actions are treasonous to its people, we MUST put an END to the treachery before it's too late!
Real hackers
by n3td3v April 12, 2006 7:42 PM PDT
Real hackers don't get caught ;-)
Reply to this comment
UFOs
by n3td3v April 12, 2006 8:06 PM PDT
A UFO flew over my backyard once.
Reply to this comment
Wow
by tanis143 April 13, 2006 7:30 AM PDT
Ok, you are all being ignorant of a few facts. First, no where in the story did it say any U.S. official was threatening to label him a terrorist. THis is just a ploy by his defense lawyers to keep him from extradited. If he had done this on U.S. soil he would have been convicted and sentenced to jail time and/or legal fines. No more, no less. If he gets extradited the same will occure. Since he did not steal any top secret info and give it to Islamic militants he would not be treated as a terrorist.

Second, quit using stories like this just to push your Bush hating agenda's. More than likely he will be extradited, tried and sentenced. Simple as that.
Reply to this comment
This Guy is a hero
by nnormore18 April 15, 2006 8:48 AM PDT
What other way is there to get at the information the government has been hiding all these years. That we have right to know. If heard enough to see he found some things out he wasnt supposed to and now they dont want the word or information to get out. Shame on the government for covering up what could change the lives of everyone on this planet for the better but the powers that be want to enslave us to the oil. I know better.
View reply
WARNING!
by gooders1 April 19, 2006 6:05 AM PDT
If you're reading this Mr.Mckinnen I advise you to escape. If all that stands between you and the patently ridiculous U.S anti terrorism laws is an unsigned note (very convincing)! then I can hardly think of a worse fate. You should be punished for any crimes you have committed but to be subject to such mediaeval laws,even for actual terrorists which you clearly are'nt is just another sad step along the ridiculous road to insanity that the Bush/Republican administration is going down. Using peoples' fear to ram through these absurd laws which are a total infringement of your civil liberties must stop NOW! The same things are starting to happen in my country(U.K) and I find it frankly terrifying.
Reply to this comment
advertisement

Latest tech news headlines

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.

More feeds available in our RSS feed index.

Markets

Market news, charts, SEC filings, and more

Related quotes

Dow Jones Industrials (6.54%) 494.13 8,046.42
S&P 500 (6.32%) 47.59 800.03
NASDAQ (5.18%) 68.23 1,384.35
CNET TECH (5.95%) 56.25 1,002.00
  Symbol Lookup
advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right