- Related Stories
-
Congress rethinks the Real ID Act
May 8, 2007 -
Real ID creator: Law's been misunderstood
April 26, 2007 -
Homeland Security dismisses Real ID privacy worries
March 21, 2007 -
Homeland Security offers details on Real ID
March 1, 2007 -
Maine rejects Real ID Act
January 25, 2007 -
Homeland Security chief defends Real ID plan
December 14, 2006 -
The Real ID rebellion
April 17, 2006 -
FAQ: How Real ID will affect you
May 6, 2005 -
National ID cards on the way?
February 14, 2005 - Related Blogs
-
House OKs $50 million in Real ID grants
June 15, 2007
During Wednesday's floor debate over a massive immigration bill, Real ID foes managed to preserve an amendment to prohibit the forthcoming identification card from being used for mandatory employment verification, signaling that the political winds have shifted from when the law was overwhelmingly enacted two years ago.
The anti-Real ID amendment is backed by two Montana Democrats, Max Baucus and Jon Tester, who say the digital ID cards represent an unreasonable government intrusion into Americans' private lives. In April, Montana became one of the states that has voted to reject Real ID.
"This was a real victory for Montana and the American people," Tester said, after the Senate vote to kill their amendment failed to muster a majority. The unsuccessful vote to table it was 45-52.
The Real ID Act says that, starting on May 11, 2008, Americans will need a federally-approved ID card to travel on an airplane, open a bank account, collect Social Security payments or take advantage of nearly any government service. States must conduct checks of their citizens' identification papers, and driver's licenses may have to be reissued to comply with Homeland Security requirements. (States that agree in advance to abide by the rules have until 2013 to comply.)
The immigration bill (Word document), which is backed by the Bush administration and has drawn the ire of many conservatives, requires employers to demand Real ID cards of new hires starting in 2013. It says that "no driver's license or state identity card may be accepted if it does not comply with the Real ID Act."
It also would try to siphon off opposition on privacy or federalism grounds from state legislators by offering fat checks--$1.5 billion over five years--with funds coming from the U.S. Treasury.
Baucus' and Tester's amendment (PDF) deletes the requirement for employer ID verification and says that "no federal funds may be provided" to states to create such a system.
Tim Sparapani, the ACLU's legislative counsel, called the vote a "victory for privacy and a rejection of building an immigration system on a faulty foundation, which was the Real ID Act."
"The way the bill was written," Sparapani said, "it should be seen as a Hail Mary pass to save Real ID from the scrap heap."
A political sea change?
Procedurally speaking, the vote was merely a preliminary one. The Baucus-Tester amendment itself still awaits a vote--and even if it is glued onto a successful immigration bill or if the immigration bill dies a second time, the underlying Real ID framework and deadlines remain in place.
That framework is estimated to cost $23.1 billion, according to the Department of Homeland Security, and could include Americans outfitted with radio frequency ID, or RFID, chips on the cards (the idea is being considered but is not final). Personal data that's on the back of the card in a two-dimensional bar code will not be encrypted because of "operational complexity," meaning any business or government agency that scans the information could record it in a database.
Politically speaking, though, Wednesday's vote could be a turning point in the national debate over Real ID. It indicates that a majority of senators are willing to curb the controversial system, which has already led to a kind of grassroots rebellion among the states.
The ACLU, which runs Realnightmare.org, says that 15 states have enacted an anti-Real ID measure, 10 more have had such legislation approved by at least one chamber, and 8 more have had it introduced in the legislature.
Homeland Security officials have defended Real ID as a way to limit illegal immigrants and to thwart terrorists from obtaining driver's licenses. Although some supporters exist in the U.S. Congress, key Democrats have said the law--enacted with minimal debate as part of an emergency Iraq war spending bill--needs to be reformed.
Other amendments (text document) to the immigration bill could affect any final vote on the legislation. One amendment, backed by senators Max Baucus (D), Charles Grassley (R) and Barack Obama (D), was nixed on Wednesday. It would have rewritten the employment verification system and provided more due process protections for American workers.
CNET News.com's Anne Broache contributed to this report
See more CNET content tagged:
Real ID Act,
immigration,
amendment,
Montana,
ID card
If you have watched the way things have been done over the years, they post news such as this to lull you to sleep and they will then pass the REAL ID Act. Protest this continuously until this thing is dead! Dead in the water.
I don't like the idea of the RFID if the data is not encrypted, because it could be abused. But if there was a lock on the card such that it could only be read when the owner unlocks it, whats wrong with that?
A voter ID card issued that actually records your vote (uniquely but anonymously) without any personal ID on it could enable a reliable and trustworthy electronic voting system. One that allows for immediate recounts, and reverification of votes without identifying the voters personally. Issued through voting places, etc. you just present valid ID and select an anonymous voter card from a bin at random.
You see, when people cry that G.B's election was fraud, they don't really want to have to prove that statement. When business hires people, they don't want proof as to wether they are legal or not. There are even people that do not wish to be tracked when they are planning to set off a bomb in say.... maybe an airport or something. Funny though, no one has offerred a viable alternative to the problems stated. Perhaps they desire the status quo. That, my friend, scares me more than a database.
http://www.paroles32.com/paroles/europe/index.php
http://www.paroles32.com/paroles/elton-john/index.php