• On MP3.com: Worst MP3 Players of 2007

August 22, 2006 10:14 AM PDT

Microsoft reaches out to Firefox developers

The head of Microsoft's open-source business has offered to help get Firefox to work with Windows Vista, but it remains to be seen whether Mozilla and the open-source community will respond positively.

Sam Ramji, the director of Microsoft's open-source software lab, posted an open invitation for them to work with the software giant on a Mozilla development discussion group mailing list Monday.

"I'm writing to see if you are open to some 1:1 support in getting Firefox and Thunderbird to run on Vista," Ramji wrote. Mozilla oversees the development of the open-source Firefox Web browser and Thunderbird e-mail client.

He stressed that Microsoft is "committed to evolving our thinking beyond commercial companies to include open-source projects" for Vista, the update to the Windows operating system due for broad release in January.

Ramji was also anxious that Mozilla and the open-source community should not take the offer lightly. He stressed that his contribution to Vista is the "nontrivial effort of getting slots for noncommercial open-source projects."

Early signs from the open-source community indicate that some are suspicious of Microsoft's motives.

But others believe that Monday's offer was a sign that Microsoft is changing. The company has finally realized that "ultimately...proprietary technologies will always get replaced by an industry-supported, open-standard alternative, hence the embrace of RSS, Open Source Lab, XML and royalty-free access to Open XML," one enthusiast wrote in a posting to the Ars Technica Web site.

Firefox already runs successfully on existing Windows, Linux and Macintosh operating systems. Testing by ZDNet UK Reviews found that it also runs well in Vista beta 2, so it's not clear why Mozilla would need help from Microsoft.

Mozilla Europe said it was "too early to comment" on Microsoft's offer.

Colin Barker of ZDNet UK reported from London.

See more CNET content tagged:
Mozilla Corp., open source, open-source community, Firefox, Mozilla Thunderbird

Add a Comment (Log in or register) 72 comments (Showing first 20 comments)
So is it difficult to port to Vista?
by alucinor August 22, 2006 10:30 AM PDT
If it's difficult to port existing Win32 apps to Vista, is this a sign that it's even more unlikely businesses will switch?

Or more likely, is this just a big PR stunt?
Reply to this comment View all 3 replies
It's not that you can't trust Microsoft...
by john.breen August 22, 2006 10:55 AM PDT
it's just that, well, you can't trust Microsoft. How many other open-source projects is Microsoft extending an olive branch to? Let's see how they fare before letting them mess around with Firefox.
Reply to this comment View all 4 replies
Microsoft Reaches out to Firefox Developers
by Nocturnex August 22, 2006 11:13 AM PDT
aaaaaaaaaand none want to help Microsoft
Reply to this comment
This is because...
by umbrae August 22, 2006 11:17 AM PDT
MS knows that most people that use Open Source tools have no intension of upgrading to the DRM infested Vista. At this rate, Linux will be a better desktop solution before Vista is released in 2010. At the very least, us XP users have a long time until we have to upgrade to Vista. I bought my video card to run games; not a stupid, overbloated OS.
Reply to this comment View reply
Hehehe
by sniperdoc August 22, 2006 11:46 AM PDT
I'm thinking the reason MS is wanting 1:1 project development for Vista is because their IE7 isn't fully functional and that a major development bug has been found in IE7 that would delay the release of Vista further. By working with the Firefox team they may be able to work out some of the kinks they have with IE7.

I've used IE7 and have had nothing but problems with it cruising a variety of web material... So I'm thinking they're looking for some insight from Firefox.
Reply to this comment
Businesses
by sniperdoc August 22, 2006 11:48 AM PDT
Heh... dead on my friend... Most businesses either have JUST switched to XP or they have workstations that don't have a smidgeon of hardware that Vista will require to run. Shoot... I'm still running some PIII's with 64MB's of RAM!!!!
Reply to this comment
They just want Firefox codes for use in Explorer.
by kamwmail-cnet1 August 22, 2006 12:18 PM PDT
simple.
Reply to this comment View all 2 replies
???
by solomonrex August 22, 2006 12:32 PM PDT
Firefox is OPEN SOURCE! And it already RUNS fine on Vista!?!

Why would they go to Redmond? Why doesn't MS just look at the code and help them out? This is very suspicious.
Reply to this comment View reply
Bad Microsoft, Bad!
by aarias August 22, 2006 12:37 PM PDT
I agree with kamwmail-cnet1
Reply to this comment
Shows a strange tactic by MSFT...
by Penguinisto August 22, 2006 12:55 PM PDT
...integrate OSS apps into Windows as often as possible, and folks won't so quickly switch OSes.

If folks think that Firefox works better in Linux (okay, IMHO it does), and they use it because (perception or not) IE is an outright hazard for surfing, then they may indeed be tempted to try the (to them) new OS. OTOH, if FF works just hunky-dory on Windows, they'll stick with Windows, thinking that they're still perfectly safe (they are safer than by using IE to hit web pages, but still...)

/P
Reply to this comment View reply
Open Source should get limited help from MS
by techned August 22, 2006 1:44 PM PDT
It's not suprising that MS is extending a hand to open source for publishing to Windows.
One of the main reasons is that if Open Source software truly becomes mainstream it would effectively hurt MS in areas where Windows and Office are concerned.
Software like Firefox and Open Office can be offered to the public either for free or to a fraction of the cost for retail versions of any MS product to any operating system besides Windows; if this type of software was exclusive to Linux and Mac, businesses looking for more affordable alternatives to MS licensed products would certainly look at these other OS products.

Also extending a hand to the Open Source community allows MS control over the development of these products as to how MS wants these products to work in Windows; MS does not want independent software developers to start "peeking and poking" in Vista to find advantages or holes that could either outshine a competing MS product or create a new security hole.

And a third reason is that MS wants to avoid the monopoly label that has been slapped on it by both the US and EU, making it to change its overwhelming marketing muscle.

Open Source should work with MS on a limited basis - asking for developer technical support but not under any type of developer guidelines that can help MS get an edge over its competition.

My two cents,
Ned
Reply to this comment View reply
For the record...
by groink_hi August 22, 2006 3:12 PM PDT
One thought I haven't seen anyone else discuss...

Microsoft is probably offering assistance to Firefox so that once they do become a part of the Firefox open source effort, their contributions can go down into the record books as showing Microsoft did in fact support open source projects. If there is any future litigation against Microsoft regarding browsers, Microsoft can open that record book and announce to the court that they did in fact work with the competition. On a case-by-case basis, it could actually work in favor of Microsoft.
Reply to this comment View all 2 replies
LIE!!!!!
by bockgk1 August 22, 2006 4:27 PM PDT
Microsoft wouldn't invite the Firefox developers to lunch without a good reason. I think that they want to "steal" the Firefox coding for tabbed browsing, popup blocking, search engines, themes, and extensions and intergrate it into a possible Inetnet Explorer 8 beta 1 and release it by April next year.
Reply to this comment View all 2 replies
why isn't this obvious?
by Hardrada August 22, 2006 4:56 PM PDT
Here's the weird part -

- Cnet reports that Microsoft makes an offer to Mozilla folks to make Vista beta builds available and give them access to OS devs if there are problems with Firefox on Vista.

- all the CNET knuckleheads go crazy about how 'evil' Microsoft is just trying to pull some nefarious stunt.

Do you folks all live in a fantasy cartoon world? Why does this have to be some sort of mafioso plot where Microsoft wants to whack the other boss after inviting him to a 'sitdown'?

Let me help you figure this out - Firefox is a really popular application. Microsoft benefits when really popular applications run properly on Windows, especially because people keep buying Windows so they can run their really popular applications.

Is there really more to it than this? Nope.
Reply to this comment View all 5 replies
MS should pay Mozilla-Firefox big bucks
by gerardogerardo80 August 22, 2006 6:01 PM PDT
Because they will provide Vista with a decent internet browser at least, making it the default browser sure would be a big plus. But for sure they will keep old good looser IE...
Reply to this comment View reply
uh IE7 has tabs...
by cdaniels75 August 22, 2006 6:31 PM PDT
the only thing IE doesn't have is themes and if Microsoft really wanted to, they could have integrated themes long ago...
Reply to this comment
Where's the downside to this request?
by kruk28 August 23, 2006 2:20 AM PDT
In addition to the previously stated reasons to believe that this is a legit outreach to the FF/Mozilla community, there are a couple of factors that haven't been mentioned here or at any other discussion boards. I think the combination of the scrutiny MS faces about any kind of action the company takes with the all the various legal battles/judgements make it necessary to reach out and make attempts to follow through on compliance. If the attempts are spurned, then its the choice of the group that turned down the overature. If the groups are ones that have litigation against MS, then turning down offers reflects on their motives, not MS's. Second, the reality of the older company leaders, along with the way they ran MS, either have been, or in the process of, being replaced by a new generation of people that are comfortable with the OS initiative, should be figured in to the equation, instead of the automatic dismissal of MS intentions. At least, when combined with the first point, a fair minded approach would be a wait and see attitude. Any kind of MS chicanery would be immediately seen and used to attack their credibility. There are a lot of progressive examples of OSS collaboration in MS new technologies like .NET Framework, ASP.NET, etc. Lastly, if the OS community is truly interested in being "open to all comers," and are about "making computing better for everyone, rich or poor," then why wouldn't Mozilla or any other OSS group not jump at the chance to work with MS? It would only benefit computer users and developers alike. Collaboration would not only improve developers abillities, but would develop a relationship that would let MS be more receptive to working closer to the OS community. If the community doesn't like the MS input, then don't incorporate it into the projects code. Seems simple enough to me, unless there are motives/agendas other than the "betterment of computing."
Reply to this comment View all 2 replies
Where's the downside to this request?
by kruk28 August 23, 2006 2:21 AM PDT
In addition to the previously stated reasons to believe that this is a legit outreach to the FF/Mozilla community, there are a couple of factors that haven't been mentioned here or at any other discussion boards. I think the combination of the scrutiny MS faces about any kind of action the company takes with the all the various legal battles/judgements make it necessary to reach out and make attempts to follow through on compliance. If the attempts are spurned, then its the choice of the group that turned down the overature. If the groups are ones that have litigation against MS, then turning down offers reflects on their motives, not MS's. Second, the reality of the older company leaders, along with the way they ran MS, either have been, or in the process of, being replaced by a new generation of people that are comfortable with the OS initiative, should be figured in to the equation, instead of the automatic dismissal of MS intentions. At least, when combined with the first point, a fair minded approach would be a wait and see attitude. Any kind of MS chicanery would be immediately seen and used to attack their credibility. There are a lot of progressive examples of OSS collaboration in MS new technologies like .NET Framework, ASP.NET, etc. Lastly, if the OS community is truly interested in being "open to all comers," and are about "making computing better for everyone, rich or poor," then why wouldn't Mozilla or any other OSS group not jump at the chance to work with MS? It would only benefit computer users and developers alike. Collaboration would not only improve developers abillities, but would develop a relationship that would let MS be more receptive to working closer to the OS community. If the community doesn't like the MS input, then don't incorporate it into the projects code. Seems simple enough to me, unless there are motives/agendas other than the "betterment of computing."
Reply to this comment View all 2 replies
MS SPIN: "FireFox Runs Better on Vista!"
by zaznet August 23, 2006 4:15 AM PDT
If Microsoft can help the project customize and tune FireFox so that it runs better under Vista than Windows XP they can then use that as a selling point to try and prove how much more efficient the Vista OS is. Sure it's not an even comparison, but Microsoft has never made any such comparisons in the past when saying a new OS was better, faster or more compatible than it's predecessor.

Not sure how many of you remember the spin Microsoft used to say Windows XP boots faster than Windows 2000. All they did was present the login screen before everything finished loading. It still took LONGER to get to the desktop and start working, but you got to type in your password faster.
Reply to this comment
Sharks are circling the Penquins in Open Waters...
by Llib Setag August 23, 2006 12:41 PM PDT
"Come die/play with us, we want to eat/help you experience the Vista point of view..."
said the Great White MShark to the Open Source/Linux tiny fish in the Open Seas of Technology.

MS is the JAWS of the technology Water World.
Reply to this comment
 See all 72 Comments >>
Powered by Jive Software

Latest tech news headlines

Resource center from News.com sponsors
Aligning CIO & CEO visions
What CIOs need to know

Click Here!
It's a simple truth. The closer you and your CEO see things, the greater your chance for success. Our exclusive report can help you get there—and help your business grow. Get the report featuring the views of 765 CEOs on innovation. learn more

Click Here!
What CEOs think: Innovation Insights for CIOs

Learn How CIOs can deliver strategic success for their enterprises

The New CIO: Beyond Technology

Learn how CIOs become heroes

Podcast: Chris Gorog of Napster

Learn about the impact of technology in strategy execution

The future of the Enterprise

Read more about tomorrow's organization

CIO Vision Series:Innovating within a retail industry disrupted by the Web

Video: CIO of Virgin Entertainment Group, Robert Fort

CIO Vision Series: Innovating around social search

Video: Yahoo CIO Lars Rabbe

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.

More feeds available in our RSS feed index.

advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right