February 16, 2006 8:21 AM PST
Sex workers call for boycott of 'Grand Theft Auto'
- Related Stories
-
LA sues maker of 'Grand Theft Auto'
January 27, 2006 -
Senators target 'graphic' video games
November 29, 2005 -
Adult-oriented video games prospering
September 30, 2005 -
Rockstar throws cold water on 'Hot Coffee'
August 10, 2005 -
The case against 'Grand Theft Auto'
August 3, 2005 -
Worm poses as pirated 'Grand Theft Auto'
July 29, 2005 -
Sex content leads to adult rating for 'Theft'
July 20, 2005 -
Hackers behind sex change, says 'Grand Theft' maker
July 13, 2005 -
ESRB to investigate 'San Andreas' sex content
July 8, 2005 -
'Grand Theft Auto' goes portable
January 10, 2005 -
'Grand Theft' of intellectual property
October 21, 2004 -
Australia bans video game
December 14, 2001
Joining the ranks of politicians, policemen and attorneys in their crusade to see the game lifted from shelves are the nation's sex workers.
On its Web site, the Sex Workers Outreach Project USA, or SWOP, is asking parents to assist them in calling for a boycott of Take-Two Interactive's controversial game.
Citing a 2001 document from the National Institute on Media and the Family's David Walsh, SWOP is calling "on all parents and all gamers to boycott Grand Theft Auto."
The organization quotes various points from Walsh's paper including, "Children are more likely to imitate a character with whom they identify. In violent video games, the player is often required to take the point of view of the shooter or perpetrator."
Although the organization admits to being "adamantly opposed to any and all forms of censorship," it wishes "to inform other parents of the potential danger extremely violent video games pose to children." Likewise, in the interest of promoting the rights of sex workers, the organization is opposed to the depiction of the rape and murder of prostitutes.
In the games, players can solicit "services" from prostitutes by driving their cars slowly near them. No sexual acts are in clear visible view, but during the "transaction," the player regains health and loses money. Although the player cannot actively rape prostitutes in the game, a possible rape is alluded to once during the story line of Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas. The prostitutes, like every other character, are also subject to homicide at the hands of the protagonist.
According to its Web site, SWOP is an organization dedicated to improving the lives of sex industry workers and to the promotion of a safe working environment for the industry.
Take-Two also faces new legal woes this week over "Grand Theft Auto." According to a Reuters report, two law firms have sued the company on behalf of Take-Two shareholders.
The firms, Milberg Weiss and Stull Stull & Brody, are seeking class action status. Milberg Weiss said in a press release on Monday that Take-Two engaged in fraudulent and illegal conduct during the class period so that insiders could sell more than 661,000 shares for proceeds of more than $18 million.
The class period is from Oct. 25, 2004, the date of the "Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas" launch, to Jan. 27, 2006, the day Los Angeles' city attorney sued Take-Two for selling pornographic video games to children.
A Take-Two spokesman declined to comment.
Take-Two shares, which lost 30 percent of their value in the time frame outlined in the suits, were trading up 12 cents to $15.35 on the Nasdaq on Wednesday.
Tim Surette reported for GameSpot. Reuters contributed to this report.
See more CNET content tagged:
boycott,
Grand Theft Auto,
parent,
organization,
children
Bottom line - blame the parents and the stores.
Bottom line - blame the parents and the stores.
for the messages that they send ("hey, kicking the crap out of
someone gives money..."), it comes to something when we are
being given lessons on morality by prostitutes. Sure, I don't
think games like GTA are good for anyone (not least because I
found them boring as hell and pretty frustrating, although I
openly admit to being rubbish at most games), but then I don't
think that selling your body is a great idea either, so maybe
people in glass houses shouldn't start hurling bricks, huh?
Starting from an indefensible position kinda makes it difficult to
be taken seriously on any issues.
for the messages that they send ("hey, kicking the crap out of
someone gives money..."), it comes to something when we are
being given lessons on morality by prostitutes. Sure, I don't
think games like GTA are good for anyone (not least because I
found them boring as hell and pretty frustrating, although I
openly admit to being rubbish at most games), but then I don't
think that selling your body is a great idea either, so maybe
people in glass houses shouldn't start hurling bricks, huh?
Starting from an indefensible position kinda makes it difficult to
be taken seriously on any issues.
feel like going out and buying a few copies of Grand Theft Auto:
San Andreas. I bet they would make great coasters.
"We are against all forms of censorship but . . . " but not this
one? Why? There plenty of movies, books, and TV shows as
violent as Grand Theft Auto or more so. Why are video games
different? Why are they singled out time and time again? Because
we must protect the children? Look, I am not a child. None of my
friends are children, and most of us play video games. Children
are not the audience Take-Two is aiming at, we are. I think it is
a mediocre game so I have not bught it, but I despise the fact
that some people would like to take that option away from me.
Unlike SWOP, I actually do hate all censorship, not just the
censoring of things I approve of. If you're problem is that violent
and sexual video games are reaching children, what you should
be pushing for is better enforcement of the ESRB's rating system,
not trying to destroy the game altogether. There is a valid
audience for it, and we want to buy it.
We live in America, and it is my right as an adult in sound mind
to decapitate virtual prostitutes with a katana if I want to. That is
what free speech means.
feel like going out and buying a few copies of Grand Theft Auto:
San Andreas. I bet they would make great coasters.
"We are against all forms of censorship but . . . " but not this
one? Why? There plenty of movies, books, and TV shows as
violent as Grand Theft Auto or more so. Why are video games
different? Why are they singled out time and time again? Because
we must protect the children? Look, I am not a child. None of my
friends are children, and most of us play video games. Children
are not the audience Take-Two is aiming at, we are. I think it is
a mediocre game so I have not bught it, but I despise the fact
that some people would like to take that option away from me.
Unlike SWOP, I actually do hate all censorship, not just the
censoring of things I approve of. If you're problem is that violent
and sexual video games are reaching children, what you should
be pushing for is better enforcement of the ESRB's rating system,
not trying to destroy the game altogether. There is a valid
audience for it, and we want to buy it.
We live in America, and it is my right as an adult in sound mind
to decapitate virtual prostitutes with a katana if I want to. That is
what free speech means.
If you are against the content of the game don't purchase it. If
your child under 18 is playing this game and your appalled then
it's a failure of the parent in properly raising and prohibiting the
game from being played.
It is the up to the parent to choose whats safe for their children
to play. If the child is learning and reacting to the characters
and acting out, than thats a failure of the parents to teach their
children right from wrong, from reality to fantasy.
I wish parents would take control, and responsibility, instead of
pointing fingers and placing blame elsewhere, i also find
disturbing the amount of groups protesting this game.
Once you know the game is a game, it's fantasy not how one is
supposed to act in a civilized world, it's played for pleasure.
This game was designed for 20 something's not as a child's
game. Parents it's your job to protect your child, not the
governments, not pressure groups. stop trying to limit mature
people from the entertainment they seek out.
If you are against the content of the game don't purchase it. If
your child under 18 is playing this game and your appalled then
it's a failure of the parent in properly raising and prohibiting the
game from being played.
It is the up to the parent to choose whats safe for their children
to play. If the child is learning and reacting to the characters
and acting out, than thats a failure of the parents to teach their
children right from wrong, from reality to fantasy.
I wish parents would take control, and responsibility, instead of
pointing fingers and placing blame elsewhere, i also find
disturbing the amount of groups protesting this game.
Once you know the game is a game, it's fantasy not how one is
supposed to act in a civilized world, it's played for pleasure.
This game was designed for 20 something's not as a child's
game. Parents it's your job to protect your child, not the
governments, not pressure groups. stop trying to limit mature
people from the entertainment they seek out.
enough said.
enough said.
Shame on all parents who do not do their jobs!!!
Shame on all parents who do not do their jobs!!!
- Definatly not take 2s responsibility or fault.
-
by Nifferson
February 16, 2006 2:47 PM PST
- While the GTA series is pretty violent and very graphic, its the parents responsibility to educate their children on things like this and not the companies... and you can't ban things just because someone is offended... I'm offended by the way you look, but I can't ban that can I? a little extreme of an example I guess but I hope you get the point. I don't believe in outlawing or banning most things. Educating people to the point of being able to properly deal with every day (at least today it is) instances is the parents responsibility. If you like you can educate them according to the ideals that you hold, in fact, if you do a good enough job of that, you wouldn't even have to talk to them specifically about things like GTA. People are always looking for that scapegoat.
-
Reply to this comment
View
reply
-
-
See all 56 Comments >>