February 23, 2006 5:17 PM PST

MPAA sues newsgroup, P2P search sites

The Motion Picture Association of America said Thursday that it sued a new round of popular Web sites associated with movie piracy, including several that serve as search engines but do not distribute files themselves.

The lawsuits mark an expansion of the copyright holders' legal strategy in the file-swapping world, targeting sites that help make downloading easier, but aren't actually delivering the files or the swapping technology themselves.

It's also the first time the group has sued organizations that direct their members to the Usenet newsgroup system, an MPAA spokeswoman said. The movie group makes little distinction between a peer-to-peer network and the search engines that point to pirated works, saying that all facilitate the distribution of copyright works.

"Disabling these powerful networks of illegal file distribution is a significant step in stemming the tide of piracy on the Internet," John Malcom, MPAA director of Worldwide Antipiracy operations, said in a statement.

The issue of targeting search engines rather than actual file-swapping networks themselves has been a touchy one in Silicon Valley, because ordinary search engines such as Google and Yahoo also can be used to find pirated works.

The Digital Millennium Copyright Act protects search engines from liability for linking to pirated works, but only if the site operators don't know that the specific content is infringing, are not deriving financial gain from the links, and act quickly to remove the links when contacted by copyright holders.

Unlike a traditional search engine such as Google, the sites targeted Thursday are filled almost exclusively with links and references to copyright movies, software and music.

IsoHunt, one of the largest search engines targeted, does provide a copyright statement that says, "We respect copyright, and will filter such P2P links at your request."

The full list of sites sued Thursday include Torrentspy.com, IsoHunt, BTHub.com, TorrentBox.com, NiteShadow.com, Ed2k-It.com, NZB-Zone.com, BinNews.com and DVDRs.net.

Electronic Frontier Foundation attorney Fred von Lohmann said that the courts had not yet ruled on whether search tools could be held liable for copy infringement. Most relevant cases, such as record labels' suit against MP3Board several years ago, have been settled before the issue has come to trial, he said.

"We haven't had a case that really tests the case of whether providing an indexing service by itself an infringement," von Lohmann said.

Thursday's suits are part of a growing series of lawsuits, criminal and civil actions taken around the world, as the movie industry works to stamp out the still-strong growth of film and TV show swapping online.

The MPAA has had a string of successes targeting sites that distribute movies in the BitTorrent file format, shutting down popular hubs such as Suprnova, LokiTorrent, and others. Earlier this week, the Hollywood announced that it had collaborated with Swiss and Belgian police to shut down a major European server called Razorback 2, part of the eDonkey network, which was allegedly used by as many as 1 million people.

File-swapping traffic has continued to grow globally throughout the course of the legal actions, however. Net monitoring firm CacheLogic estimates that P2P still accounted for more than 60 percent of overall Internet traffic at the beginning of 2006, with video files accounting for about 60 percent of that data.

Traditional peer-to-peer software companies such as eDonkey and Lime Wire have not been targeted by lawsuits in recent months. However, they have faced warnings from record labels and the MPAA that their turn could come soon if they continue to allow unregulated swapping online.

The MPAA previously announced an agreement with BitTorrent.com, the creators of the BitTorrent file-swapping technology who also run a file search engine. Under that agreement, BitTorrent agreed to take down links to feature films in its search tool.

See more CNET content tagged:
newsgroup, P2P, search engine, eDonkey, file-swapping

Add a Comment (Log in or register) 39 comments (Showing first 20 comments)
Where's the Line Drawn?
by Yoshihama1 February 23, 2006 6:58 PM PST
"The movie group makes little distinction between a peer-to-peer network and the search engines that point to pirated works, saying that all facilitate the distribution of copyright works."

Well, if that's the case, Microsoft is facilitating the distribution by creating an OS that the Bit Torrent client runs on. Mozilla is facilitating the distribution by supporting the display of the HTML from the search web sites. And here in California at least, PG&E is facilitating the distribution by powering computers that can both download and upload bits. And let's not even start on SBC, Verizon, etc. for providing a network backbone for these files to be shared across.

Man, everyone's FACILITATING the distribution of these works. Time to shut down the Internet!
Reply to this comment View all 5 replies
The MPAA and RIAA never learn
by unknown unknown February 23, 2006 7:02 PM PST
They get one site to close and another pops up. They closed the original Napster and plenty of replacements popped up. These sites might be popular but hardly irreplaceable. According the reports I've seen P2P use has grown instead shrank. I think the MPAA would be wise develop a service that takes advantage of BitTorrent for legal downloads, cause obviously there is a demand for downloadable content. Their current movie download services just well suck and the DRM forces people to watch it on their computer. The quality on the legal service is also sub-par (it might not be too noticeable on TV but on a high resolution monitor it's terriable) while the price to rent it is actually higher than what you'd pay at Hollywood Video, Blockbuster, or NetFlix for what you get.
Reply to this comment View all 2 replies
Failure to adapt leads to extinction ...
by PiratePete February 23, 2006 9:23 PM PST
With digital technology advancing almost daily, hollywood and the music industry are quickly learning that they are grappling to save a dying business model.

Unfortunately, these major label companies are so used to making incredibly large margins on their products, that they have an obvious reluctance to adapt their business to their environment. Instead, they are trying to adapt the environment to their business model, and it is definitely not working.

Are the vast hundreds of dollars they receive from their silly lawsuits really compensating them for the millions they lose on the internet? Definitely not. Sadly, if they would only be willing to reduce their margins and begin to offer a quality, downloadable product, they would quickly recoup their 'perceived' losses.

The success of iTunes is proof that given the choice to either pay for or steal their music, an overwhelming number will actually fork out the money.

If the big labels do not adapt their business model soon; they will find themselves extinct as the simplicity of production and distribution of content over the internet quickly renders them obsolete.
Reply to this comment View all 2 replies
MPAA sues film directors
by Brian G February 23, 2006 9:48 PM PST
directors facilitating the distribution of films by creating films
Reply to this comment View reply
huh?
by darkane February 24, 2006 4:55 AM PST
"The movie group makes little distinction between a peer-to-peer network and the search engines that point to pirated works, saying that all facilitate the distribution of copyright works."

That's like saying that phone directories are equally responsible for an advertisers bad or unethical business practices.

Someone should sue the MPAA for making the world a dumber place.

http://blog.bryanserven.com
Reply to this comment View reply
MPAA/RIAA make noise to scar the pigeons..
by nap1805 February 24, 2006 5:01 AM PST
Well, another great strike in the piracy lines, which will help... who? This just means that instead of going every night to Torrentspy to get my links to Smallville, we will go somewhere else.

My only wish: guys, speed up the development of independant search engines.. No web links, no tracking, let's try to be as anonymous as possible.

And I would love to pay 10/15 euros a month to download anything I want. The fault? RIAA & MPAA most certainly. They are the one slowing down the progress. That was my 5 cents, keep it.
Reply to this comment View reply
Why not sue Google
by Web-JIVE February 24, 2006 5:34 AM PST
You can find the same stuff on Google so why not sue them? I'll tell you why, its easier to go after the small guy. I personally don't download movies, takes WAY to long. Cheaper to go to the store and rent it. I'm just tire of RIAA, MPAA and others suing individuals and nobody's to make their point.
Reply to this comment
How the MPAA is shooting itself
by BlueBearr February 24, 2006 9:09 AM PST
I was an avid fan of a TV show. Once, I missed an episode & I didn't record it. I thought about looking for it online, but I didn't feel like dealing with the hassle of "am I anonymous", "how can I cover my tracks," etc.

Guess what? I didn't die. I realized that it just wasn't so important. *IF* I had been able to get a decent copy quickly/cheaply, they would have still had my eyeballs slavishly devoted to their content and its commercials. As it is, I now sometimes watch. Likewise, I realize that it is not that vital to me if I see movies when they first come out. I'm content to wait until I can rent it or even borrow it.

If the MPAA continues to alienate its customers, and make them fearful, there will be a backlash. And what they fear most may happen: people will wake up to the fact that the content isn't worth it. With movie theater ticket prices too high and no good sources online, people may just decide that they don't care about getting "the latest and greatest" which seems to be so much of what the movie's business model is based on. Instead, they'll wait for DVD, or even eschew recent content for that vast library of old movies that is out there.
Reply to this comment
MPAA just don't get it
by Rocker452 February 24, 2006 11:17 AM PST
These people keep sueing people and P2P traffic is increaseing not decreaseing, you would think they would get the hint that what there doing isn't working. If they were smart they would work on useing the technology to work for them instead of trying to shut it down. Maybe one day the light bulb will go off and they will get it.
Reply to this comment
Dummies...
by cidman2001 February 24, 2006 12:01 PM PST
I you read the judges ruling in the last Supreme Court case, they refer to "intent". I think the movie/music industry had the intent to shut everyone else out of distribution by creating digital content in the first place. As an ASCAP member I'm sure these formats have cheated me out of revenue all those years they were only accessible to record companies and rich people who could afford the equipment...shouldn't they be sued?
I think their own attempts at slanting the playing field have backfired. Now there mad....Waaaaaa!
Reply to this comment View reply
How to fix this
by R. U. Sirius February 24, 2006 12:53 PM PST
> Net monitoring firm CacheLogic estimates that
> P2P still accounted for more than 60 percent
> of overall Internet traffic at the beginning
> of 2006, with video files accounting for
> about 60 percent of that data.

According to other articles today on this subject, some of these sites have small memberships (e.g. 25,000 members).

The funny thing about this whole digital download battle is that no one can point to any hard data proving that the industry is being hurt by the small percentage of people who use stuff like Bittorrent. Conversely, Apple is making a big deal out of the fact that they've exceeded a billion downloads via iTunes. So the math doesn't add up.


I don't know if consumers will ever tire . I don't know where the tipping point is before a major consumer backlash against the content industry tactics (sch as multiple formats of the same content, customers being sued, heavy handed DRM, and so forth) begins. But it seems to me that more and more anger is brewing over these tactics, and the content industries would do well to heed the warning.

Nonetheless, there is only one way to fix this battle, and that is a complete consumer boycott of MPAA and RIAA material.
Reply to this comment
Give us real evidence!
by heystoopid February 24, 2006 1:47 PM PST
Give us real evidence, not corporate propaganda!

Where is the real evidence facts figures information, court filings ,subpeona's et al

Looks to me that the Judith M reporting of facts as fiction, is the rule rather than the exception in the mainstream corporate media!

Looks like 1984, is rapidly becoming reality, as the average journalist now files corporate propaganda as fact, rather than ask the six basic questions and the news editors conviently forget same as happened over at the New York Times, with Judith M.!
Reply to this comment
Down with MPAA And RIAA...
by chhooks February 24, 2006 5:59 PM PST
Listen people...
Do you remember history from grade school? Of course now the books have been rewritten but when I went to school they told about a tea party that took place in Boston. Seems the overbearing, unfair overlords had taken advantage to those who were unable to prevent it... At least until the common people agreed together that something had to happen... The secret? Unity! Alone I can do nothing. Together, we can change the course of the 'overlords' of entertainment.

Item #1: Refuse to purchase ANY form of media with DRM attached. There are a great number of performers that create and sell their own media... Support them. Contact your favorite (RIAA)performer's website and inform them you will not be buying their CD's due to their alliance with the overlords.

Item #2: Ask all political candidates their stand on DRM before elections. Follow up on their performance afterward. Make that performance public knowledge so that interested FREE citizens can vote out the liars. I would be very interested in this one... Senators, representatives etc...

Item #3: Boycott any operating system that adds to the already too stringent DRM abilities of MS. Can you say No Way to Vista?

Item #4: Any software that requires DRM to function should be returned to the manufacturer with the message that you do not agree with the EULA and demand your money back



Together we can break the slavery that the entertainment overlords have placed us under!
Reply to this comment
.. more stupidity
by Fault February 25, 2006 5:29 AM PST
I don't ever recall that files containing only HASH are illegal. The MPAA and RIAA are starting to get on my nerves, someone needs to shut them up and shut them down for good.
Reply to this comment
I would never use anything for downloading movies
by cpudrewfl February 26, 2006 12:02 PM PST
To download movies the p2p or torrent dont work, usually wrong titles, bad copy. That is why I have net flix and game fly to have movies and games delivered to my house and my invaluable dvd recorder and 123 copy dvd and nero for my ps2 games. I know the copy im getting is real and authentic.
Reply to this comment
MPAA
by stansoft February 26, 2006 12:16 PM PST
IT's NEVER ENOUGH FOR THESE GUYS...

--

"If you think you know everything, you should know about http://www.enthem.com by now"
Reply to this comment
NEVER ENOUGH
by stansoft February 26, 2006 12:17 PM PST
SCARE TACTICS AS ALWAYS...

--

"If you think you know everything, you should know about http://www.enthem.com by now"
Reply to this comment
 See all 39 Comments >>
Powered by Jive Software
advertisement

Latest tech news headlines

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.

More feeds available in our RSS feed index.

advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right
  • Nanotech: The Circuits Blog

    Timing rumors surface for AMD plant spin-off

    Rumors persist that Advanced Micro Devices is planning to spin off all or part of its manufacturing operations.

  • Gallery

    Photos: Ron Paul's RNC alternative

    As the Republican convention took place just miles away, a crowd rallied for the former presidential candidate and his message of limited government, ensured civil liberties, lower taxes, and peace.

  • Digital Noise: Music and Tech

    Was 1980s music that bad?

    NPR asks listeners which year featured the best music, and the 1980s emerge as a bleak era. Personally, the '80s figure prominently in my collection, but well behind the 1970s.

  • Beyond Binary

    Microsoft begins big ad push

    Microsoft's multi-year push, estimated at $300 million, begins with a spot featuring Bill Gates and Jerry Seinfeld aired during Thursday's NFL game.

  • Video

    YouTube plays party politics

    During the presidential campaigning four years ago, YouTube didn't even exist. Now it's a tool candidates must master to get their message across. CNET's Kara Tsuboi stops by the YouTube upload booths at the Democratic and Republican conventions to find out why Google's video site has such a big presence in Denver and St. Paul, Minn.

  • News - Digital Media

    Michael Moore plans Net-only film premiere

    Filmmaker plans to premiere his latest documentary exclusively on the Internet for free, forgoing the traditional theatrical release.

  • Video

    Political party playlists

    We know the Democrats and Republicans are split over policy issues, but does their musical taste fall down party lines too? And what kind of gadgets did they bring to the conventions to listen to their music? CNET reporter Kara Tsuboi finds out.

  • News - Politics and Law

    What you can--and can't--find about Palin on the Internet

    John McCain's choice of Sarah Palin as a running mate has inspired a wealth of creativity on the Internet.

  • News - Cutting Edge

    Execs predict next Google-like tech

    On eve of company's 10-year anniversary, researchers and business pundits speculate about what technologies might someday have as much impact as Google.

  • Gallery

    Photos: The brains behind Google Chrome

    Here's a look at some of the engineers and executives who took the stage at the company's headquarters as they unveiled the new browser.

  • Crossfade

    Ying Yang Twins, 'Look Back At It': Free MP3 of the Day

    This amped-up duo gets the party started with a mix of crisp, Southern hip-hop beats and shout-along rhymes. Download a free MP3 of "Look Back At It" courtesy of CNET Download Music.

  • Green Tech

    Clean-tech group forms to support Obama

    "Clean Tech and Green Business for Obama" aims to raise $1 million for the Democratic presidential nominee while elevating issues of climate change and alternative energy.