AT&T Tech Support 360
January 12, 2006 5:37 PM PST
Congress looks askance at firms that bow to China
Last modified: January 13, 2006 10:16 AM PST
- Related Stories
-
Microsoft censors Chinese blogger
January 4, 2006 -
A cyber blind spot on human rights
December 1, 2005 -
Looking the other way
September 16, 2005 -
Microsoft blocking words on China's Web?
June 13, 2005 -
MSN bloggers try to foul up censorship tool
December 3, 2004 -
Yahoo yields to Chinese Web laws
August 13, 2002
Rep. Christopher Smith, a New Jersey Republican, said Thursday that the U.S. House of Representatives Subcommittee on Human Rights, which he heads, will hold a hearing in early to mid- February. Smith has invited representatives from the U.S. State Department, Microsoft, Yahoo, Cisco Systems, Google, and the international watchdog group Reporters Without Borders to speak.
The effort is designed to determine what can be done, either by legislative mandate or on a voluntary basis, to "dissociate a company from working hand-in-glove with a dictatorship," Smith said in a telephone interview with CNET News.com.
A similar hearing is planned for Feb. 1 in the Congressional Human Rights Caucus said Ryan Keating, communications director for Rep. Tim Ryan, the Ohio Democrat leading the parallel effort. The caucus, unlike the human rights subcommittee, is an "informal" committee that is overseen by about 30 House members and includes a few hundred others, Smith among them, as supporting members.
As first reported by the Boston Globe, both Ryan and Smith are in the process of concocting new laws. These will likely take cues from recommendations issued by Reporters Without Borders and the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission, a 12-member, congressionally-selected governmental panel.
Paris-based Reporters Without Borders this week backed a law banning an American company from hosting an e-mail server in any "repressive" country. It's also suggested that American corporations come up with a joint plan for how to handle censorship requests from foreign governments, including refusal to censor terms like "democracy" and "human rights."
The companies have defended their decisions by saying that, as multinational corporations, they had no choice but to comply with Chinese mandates.
Yahoo spokeswoman Mary Osaka said the company must adhere to local laws in all countries where it operates, though it recognizes that there are "unique and inherent challenges to doing business in China."
Google representative Debbie Frost said that: "We are mindful that governments wherever we do business around the world impose restrictions on access to information and of course we are obliged by law to follow them."
Frost added that Google is a relatively new entrant to China and values user interests and access to information. "The experience for users in China searching on Google.com has not been changed by Google in any way," she said.
Cisco has been accused of building technology that allows Chinese officials to filter sites. "Our routers have embedded technology in them that allows network administrators to manage their networks," said John Earnhardt, the company's senior manager for policy communications, acknowledging that "this technology can be used to block access to sites they don't want users to access." But the same features are present in routers regardless of the country in which they are sold, he noted.
According to the China security review commission, China operates one of the world's most sophisticated Net filtration systems, targeting comments viewed as threats to the Chinese Communist Party's tenets while letting anti-U.S. and antidemocracy sites stand. The country's Web-using contingent has grown exponentially, reaching 103 million in June 2005. It also offers the world's second-largest Internet market.
Meanwhile, "U.S. companies continue to play an active role in China's Internet censorship, providing hardware, software and content filtering services," the commission said in its 2005 annual report to Congress. "While these interactions between U.S. corporations and China's government may be legitimate commercial decisions, in sum they had the effect of helping to build and legitimize the government's media censorship efforts."
Last week, Microsoft admitted to removing a blog from its MSN Spaces service that was kept by a Chinese journalist who allegedly voiced antigovernment sentiments. The company has also been accused of blocking words like "democracy" and "freedom" on its MSN site.
In September, Reporters Without Borders blamed Yahoo for handing Chinese officials a personal e-mail message linked to Chinese journalist Shi Tao's account that contained what the government considered a "state secret." Tao was ultimately convicted and sentenced to 10 years in prison.
"We balance legal requirements against our strong belief that our long-term involvement in China contributes to the continued modernization of the country through the advancement of communications, commerce as well as access to information created by our products and services," Yahoo spokeswoman Osaka said.
Reporters Without Borders has also accused Google of blocking news items--that have garnered government disapproval--from its Google News China site. A company representative denied such activity Thursday.
"Some sources were not included because their sites are inaccessible and therefore their inclusion does not provide a good experience for our news users who are looking for information," the representative said.
"There is no democracy in Beijing--it's not a democracy, and they have a very, very poor human rights record on a myriad of fronts," said Smith, who has conducted 25 hearings about Chinese human rights issues since taking office in 1981. "I think you have to ask the question: Is this money worth it? At what cost? People going to prison for 10 years...that to me, that's just not worth it."
Critics of Smith's proposal for new laws have likened it to Canada or the European Union banning their companies from doing business in the U.S. because of the antiprivacy rules found in the Patriot Act. Some Canadian advocacy groups and labor unions have been opposing outsourcing of work to the U.S. because of privacy concerns.
"If Yahoo isn't doing business in China, someone else will," said Sonia Arrison, director of technology studies at the free-market Pacific Research Institute. "It's putting American businesses at a disadvantage in the world marketplace." Arrison suggested that instead U.S. companies join together to present a unified front to the Chinese government.
Smith said there's reason to worry about other countries as well. He recently traveled to Vietnam, where he had an emotional meeting with the family of a man serving a 13-year prison sentence. His crime? Translating an American document about democracy that he had downloaded from the Web.
U.S. companies should want no part in such behavior, he said: "The crime, I would submit, is committed by the countries themselves."
Earlier proposals in Congress have included creating an Office of Global Internet Freedom inside the federal government to come up with ways to thwart Net-censorship by other nations.
Microsoft did not respond to a request for comment.
See more CNET content tagged:
Borders Books & Music,
censorship,
China,
Cisco Systems Inc.,
law
It used to be that the United States took a higher moral stance than other countries ... or at least, it tried to. Now it's all about the dollar.
If we should boycott their goods when something like this happens it would change theis approach.
This blog was located on U.S. Soil.
This blog was read by U.S. Citizens (as well as Chinese Citizens).
This blog contained NEWSWORTHY, useful, wholesome, information, honest information.
As such it was protected by the U.S. Constitution.
This blog did not violate any laws, in China or in the world.
This blog contained public information on the suppressive and illegal activities of the Chinese government.
This blog was protected by the U.S. constitution. As it was located on U.S. soil and read by U.S. readers.
This blog could well have been useful to many people around the world (not just China).
Microsoft is partnering with the Chinese government to eliminate the free press in China.
We know the name of Big Brother, his name is Bill.
Now I am not saying china is right however they have the right to run their country as they see fit preventing US compainies from doing bussiness will only hurt the changes already starting to take place in china. Capitalism is becoming more and more the chines way of life and with it will come changes in their human rights activities.
And where do the Feds get the cojones to try to legistlate activities in other countries ? Next they'll be passing a law to make it illegal to smoke in public in Cuba, or something.
companies enforcing Chinese censorship, exactly the opposite
conclusion is reached in the case of the French complaint of ebay's
Nazi paraphernalia being made available in France; they hadn't
even demanded the site be shut down, but only that it be made
unavailable to web surfers in France.
So which way DO we want it?
and it's the rights of American voters to decide that WE choose to punish those companies that choose this. Will this 'hamper' American companies? In the short run maybe because they now can't count on all that chinese money... but in the long run perhaps it would fare better for them in the hearts and minds of the chinese people if they refuse to participate in their oppression.
We 'punish' foreign governments for such things... let's not say we can't hold OUR OWN corporations to the same standard.
GM's car designs are blatantly copied and they do nothing.
Now, UK gambling sites locate their servers outsite the US and offer their services to US residents when gambling on these websites is clearly prohibitted in America.
US banks and brokerages like Goldman Sachs etcare also investing money in such companies.
If these companies can show the fing*r to the US Govt, why can't they do the same in China ???
Of course this is all for your own protection.
- Chinese Censorship
-
by sparafucilli
January 18, 2006 1:05 PM PST
- To defeat the censors it seems all a citizen would have to do is substitute words/key phrases - like instead of China use USA; instead of "democracy" use "capitalistic pig". A tried and true method once the shorthand is known by all. Or let's have MS, Yahoo, Google et all do the substitution themselves. They're well practiced in the art it seems.
-
Reply to this comment
View
reply
-
-
See all 25 Comments >>