December 28, 2006 8:39 AM PST
Red Hat's next Linux due before March
- Related Stories
-
Red Hat earnings shrug off Oracle threat
December 21, 2006 -
Open-source leader leaving Novell for Google
December 21, 2006 -
Oracle has yet to prove Linux cred
October 27, 2006 -
Red Hat releases Xen-enabled Linux beta
September 11, 2006 -
Linux heavies plan lightweight virtualization
August 22, 2006
Now Red Hat is being more definitive. "I'm sure we will ship a gold (version) on February 28," Chief Executive
The delay isn't a major problem for Red Hat, said Pund-IT analyst
"Making certain that RHEL 5 is thoroughly locked, loaded and debugged before sending it out the door (is) more important in the end than meeting a deadline," he said. And because Red Hat sells software subscriptions, all existing customers get free upgrades, so the company doesn't consider the new version a "revenue event," he added.
One major feature arriving in RHEL 5 is
Virtualization has been a feature on higher-end servers for years and has arrived on mainstream x86 machines chiefly through software from
Microsoft is working on another
Reworking an operating system's foundation, as "hypervisors" such as Xen require, is necessarily complicated, however, and Red Hat Chief Technology Officer
RHEL 5 is based on version 2.6.18 of the Linux kernel--the core of the operating system--compared to 2.6.9 for the current RHEL 4. The software includes new security features to protect against some attacks, plus a "technology preview" of Red Hat's Stateless Linux software to let desktop machines pull data and settings from central servers.
Red Hat's chief competitor, Novell, began shipping Xen in its
"Clearly, the doomsday scenario that some investors feared regarding the entrance of Oracle into the enterprise Linux arena and the ramifications of the
Red Hat's billings increased 50 percent, compared with the year-earlier quarter, to $133 million, well above analysts' average expectations of $120 million to $125 million, Stimson said.
One challenge Red Hat faces is integration of JBoss, open-source software from a company of the same name that
Among Red Hat sales worth at least $1 million in the quarter, two-thirds involved JBoss software, Szulik said. "When we acquired (JBoss, it) was an unprofitable venture. It is still unprofitable, but it's improving," he said. Red Hat expanded JBoss sales into Asia, Latin America and the Middle East, and the acquisition presents an opportunity to boost revenue from subscription renewals, he said.
See more CNET content tagged:
Red Hat Inc.,
Red Hat Enterprise Linux,
Xen,
virtualization,
SuSE Linux Enterprise Server
I still use RHEL 3 servers precisely because there's no pressing need to upgrade, and because RHEL still gets the same revenue from our subscriptions, they have no huge and burning desire to make me upgrade to RHEL 5 (it also means that they do a damned fine job of backporting patches and critical feature improvements into their previous versions). This means that I don't have to waste tons of money in upgrading software or hardware just because a new version comes out.
Now compare/contrast this with Microsoft, who will be [i]very[/i] busy trying to force their customers to upgrade to whatever server version comes out next, whether said customer wants to or not. This is because MSFT [i]needs[/i] to sell new licenses just to keep cash flow coming in.
I almost feel sorry for the Windows-heavy (or Windows-only) IT shops... every time MSFT spews out a new server version, incompatibilities and "product lifecycles" will require them to blow a huge wad of cash just to run the new OS version (not to mention the ever-increasing hardware requirements... if Vista is a resource hog, I can only imagine what the server version is going to be like...)
/P