Unlimited long distance $24.99/mo
January 28, 2005 6:24 PM PST
Regulators tell Microsoft there's plenty in a name
- Related Stories
-
EU: We could fine Microsoft into submission
January 28, 2005 -
Microsoft won't fight EU ruling--for now
January 24, 2005 -
Microsoft readies scaled-back Windows
December 22, 2004 -
EU slaps record fine on Microsoft
March 24, 2004
Microsoft announced last month that it intended to use the name "Windows XP Reduced Media Edition" for the program, which has, by order of the European Commission, been stripped of the Media Player that's usually included.
The Commission was concerned that the name would undermine its order by turning consumers off to the new version of Windows and prompting them to stay with the current version, according to reports. So Microsoft is ditching the name and is now busy coming up with a new one, Microsoft spokeswoman Stacy Drake said Friday.
"The Commission has requested that we change the name from the original suggestion," Drake said. "While we believe this name complies (with the commission's orders), we have agreed to make the change. We're working together with the commission to come up with an alternative name."
A representative for the Commission was not immediately available to comment. Recently, however, a Commission representative had threatened further fines if Microsoft did anything to make the new product unattractive, according to several news reports published Friday.
The uninspired name was likely a reflection of Microsoft's feeling about the new product, which the Commission ordered it to release last year as part of the antitrust sanctions it imposed after finding Microsoft guilty of abusive business practices. The Commission also fined the company $648 million.
In addition to lacking a copy of Windows Media Player, the new version of Windows won't be able to do things such as play a CD or MP3 file or transfer music to a portable device--at least not without additional software from another company.
"Given the complexity of implementing the remedies, it's not surprising that there will be issues and questions that go along with the process," Drake said. "Microsoft remains fully committed to implementing the Commission's decision and working with them toward that goal."
Nevertheless, Drake defended the company's original name choice, saying it would have accurately conveyed the difference between the two products. Microsoft is working with its partners to release the new program next month, as scheduled, and has already shipped it to some computer makers in Europe, she added.
Microsoft plans to sell the new product in Europe only and charge the same price that the fuller-featured version fetches there. The company also plans to appeal the Commission's ruling but recently decided not to fight a court order requiring immediate compliance with sanctions, after losing a bid to delay them.
CNET News.com's Ina Fried contributed to this report.
See more CNET content tagged:
Stacy Drake,
commission,
antitrust,
Microsoft Windows Media Player,
Europe
Um, it's the commission that wanted WMP out of the OS, so the wanted *exactly* a "Reduced Media" version.
Make the OS more unattractive, and the best description of that OS would be less attractive.
While I know some people (not many) that prefer Real or other media players to WMP, I don't know a single one that wouldn't take the verion that at least included WMP. Media player vendors are going to have to shell out big cash to convince an OEM to put on this version of Windows. Hope it's worth it to them.
I suggest plugging the PC into the socket. Give it a try. Let us know how you got on.
All Linux/Mac/MS choices aside; we all realize that this a pretty bold fine (personally I would pull out of the European market altogether and take my fiscal loss rather than be raped of 750 million dollars to a money hungry EU). I do not remember being offered only QuickTime and iTunes via Apple. Several Linux distos. offered only one media player by default, with no lawsuits in sight I would see this as being a biased court decision.
I would also think that many users in the EU would be illerterate enough to not be able to install an outside version. This is the equivalent of buying a Chevy car, then filing a lawsuit because you do not have the option to put Ford seats in them out of the factory.
- Re: Poor Logic (David Neal)
-
by Jim Harmon
February 3, 2005 1:08 PM PST
- I admit that my reply "I prefer an OS that's intuitive" was less than complete. I was addressing the Linux / Win XP issue.
-
Reply to this comment
-
-
See all 48 Comments >>To address the Mac / Win XP issue, I would also add that I prefer that the OS run 90% of the most popular software and that it run on a new computer that costs $500.