May 3, 2007 3:21 PM PDT
Microsoft hints at general plan for IE 8
- Related Stories
-
Microsoft's latest spin on Web apps
May 3, 2007 -
Microsoft hopes 7 is lucky number for IE
October 18, 2006
At Microsoft's Mix '07 conference in Las Vegas this week, IE platform architect Chris Wilson recapped Microsoft's development priorities in the making of Internet Explorer (IE) 7 and outlined some of its goals for the next version of its browser.
Wilson said Microsoft intends to create a follow-on version, IE 8, within two years of IE 7's release, which came out in October.
The priorities Microsoft set for IE 7, Wilson said, are the same for IE 8: strong security, ease of use and Web development improvements.
"It's clear we have a lot to do with the Web developer platform," he said addressing an audience of mostly Web developers at Mix.
Specifically, he said Microsoft will invest more in layout and adhering to the Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) 2.1 specifications. He also said Microsoft wants to make its browser object model more interoperable "to make it easier to work with other browsers and allow more flexible programming patterns."
In addition, he said the Ajax Web programming style needs more client-side application programming interfaces to allow developers to create more powerful applications.
"There's work in the standardization bodies to do local storage and get better security models," Wilson said, adding that Microsoft is working with the W3C on standardizing HTML version 5 and XHTML version 1 and 1.1.
He said adherence to standards is increasingly important to Web site developers but Microsoft is in a "challenging" position as it introduces more standards compliance.
Because previous versions of Internet Explorer strayed from standards, new versions of Internet Explorer, such as IE 7, have caused some Web sites to not work for end users, he said.
"Web development compatibility is really crucial for building applications and...for us to deploy browsers (but) it has to be an evolutionary step," he said, noting that half a billion people use some version of Internet Explorer. "If we say, 'Here is your new browser--it's standards compatible,' we actually disrupt the existing ecosystem and it doesn't actually make it better for anyone."
See more CNET content tagged:
Web development,
Microsoft Internet Explorer 7,
Microsoft Internet Explorer,
ease of use,
programming
properly, expecially if you were using CSS. What a disaster! I am
currently building a web site that has a single line of text in a
Mac and Windows (IE 6 included) it draws in the correct place. In IE
& it draws 100 px higher, apparently inside properly colsed
above it. So IE7 appears to be even worse than IE6.
IE 8 will be more compliant and standards supportive? I doubt it!
I can't wait!
assuming that the next release of Safari will support Gmail's Java
standards, that is.) Anyone know when the next Firefox is
dropping? That's supposed to be when the browser supports the
rest of the standards.
Ha ha ha! Nice one! Haven't we heard this with every release of anything Microsoft?? Don't get me wrong, I'll do my part and install IE8 and patch it every week and report bug crashed daily to them, but isn't it time to admit "We're releasing something so be prepared to patch it every week for a few months"
Be straight with the users and I think you'll find them more recptive to you.
Well I guess you will not take notice, because you never take notice.
just did the right thing it wouldn't be better? People wouldn't all fix
their web sites immediately to work with a compliant IE v8?????
Yep. And the sun will rise in the west tomorrow morning.
Standards? MS still thinks the can make up their own standards
and ignore all the world as they become more irrelevant.
- Constant Updating ?- not me
-
by FalseToU
February 26, 2008 4:54 PM PST
- I do use XP. I have gone so far as to install SP2 to have DEP available, even though it requires a tedious shutting down of a miriad MS "services" in order to establish a safe PC.
-
Reply to this comment
-
-
See all 36 Comments >>I have installed exactly two "updates:" One to fix a bug in the way NTFS is handled (which has had a "hotfix" out since the original XP, but has never been fixed in a service pack), and I can't remember at the moment what the second one was for. I have dependable hardware and software security and have disabled a number of unnecessary and dangerous Microsoft "services" and ports. I have yet to have a virus or rootkit, and I no longer even get spam or adware/spyware on my PC. Unless I run into another bug MS never fixed, I have no intention of applying any more updates - every thing is fine just the way it is. I don't plan on jumping on MS's "constant critical update" merry-go-round. I say "the Emperor has no clothes." Of course I don't do stupid stuff like open email attachments (I ask for cut and paste) or surf to seamy websites, and my anti-virus scans webpages before delivering them to me. But I'm happy with what I have at the moment and for as long as it works for me. When it no longer serves my needs, I'll cross that bridge - but it will NOT be VISTA! MS has some very scary plans of which VISTA is only the first step. If people are gullible enough to fall for it, in the future, you may PAY for your PC, but MS will CONTROL it! (Google Palladium, Longhorn, Fritz-Chip, Trusted Computing, etc. and follow where they lead - Microsoft if trying very hard to misdirect your attention so you don't notice that Palladium is baaack! Only this time they have formed themselves a cartel/consortium with Intel, HP, IBM - so they won't have a replay of the user uproar of 2003 when they were all by their lonesome and had to back down. This time MS is confident they have safety in numbers, but they still aren't breathing a word about what's really under the hood.