June 4, 2005 4:22 PM PDT
Internet busy with talk of Apple-IBM parting
- Related Stories
-
Apple to ditch IBM, switch to Intel chips
June 3, 2005 -
Apple to Intel: Some advantage, lots of risk
May 23, 2005 -
Xbox 360 demos running on Macs
May 13, 2005
Since the CNET News.com story broke Friday afternoon, technology Web sites have been abuzz with feedback. By late Saturday, almost 2,000 comments were posted in response to a related item on Slashdot.org; 175 posts were made in response to News.com's initial story; and almost 100 comments were posted in response to a related AppleInsider story.
People generally seem to be reacting in three ways: in favor of the change, opposed, or they are simply unwilling to believe its true until hearing it directly from Apple Chief Executive Steve Jobs. He's expected to make the announcement at the company's Worldwide Developer Conference Monday in San Francisco.
Some, like News.com reader Sam Kass, are "psyched" about the news and see it as Apple playing catch-up from a performance standpoint, "while still being top-notch at (human-computer interaction)."
"Down the road (Apple) has the potential to take the industry by storm," he said.
Bob Zhu, who is both an Apple and PC user, also thinks it's a good move and questions IBM's commitment on Mac CPU development.
?Switching to Intel doesn't guarantee Apple to have more powerful machines in future than if they stick with IBM," the News.com reader wrote. "But the move will give Apple a level playground with all other PC makers."
In contrast, another News.com reader, John Bresnahan, is very upset about the news. "I will never buy Apple again, ever. If this is true, I am very sad," he wrote. "How will I get new software for my computer?"
An AppleInsider member was one of many to suggest that the switchover to Intel is likely just for its WiMax chips.
"I don't think Apple and IBM are parting ways as reported," the member wrote. "The WiMax theory fits the overall picture better."
Others found the Apple-IBM divorce news curious, given that Microsoft recently dropped Intel for its Xbox 360.
"Now Apple might be doing the opposite. Are the two events in any way connected?" a AppleInsider member wondered.
Some just pooh-poohed the news, calling it stock market manipulation or a fake story leaked by Apple to catch a spy, as a Mac Observer member suggested.
See more CNET content tagged:
Apple Computer,
stock market,
IBM Corp.,
microprocessor,
reader
It kicked both of their ***** royallyin all but memory register access, which was to be corrected in the next model.
the Mac open to heavy cloning. Second, it makes it to where people
with existing Macs will have to run seperate software that is
compiled for the Altivec Power PC processors. I think its a hoax,
and that Apple has played us for fools as revenge for all the rumors
circulating the net. They probably have something really cool in
store for Monday.
didn't include my name.
Still in a way this article is describing how powerful their other
article is and how much impact it could have on the stock
monday...
Maybe it's not stock manipulation by New.com/Cnet itself, but
by their "source".
I wouldn't say that if I wasn't so sure that Apple wont switch to
intel CPU. There are many logic reasons why it wont happen, and
I'm tired of repeating them every time this rumor pops-up.
My point is, if some company would like to send Apple stock
down monday, this would be the best and safest way.
change, opposed, or they are simply unwilling to believe its true
until hearing it directly from Apple Chief Executive Steve Jobs."
Tell me, how many more ways are there to react? What a dumb
statement.
concentrating on the technical issues. Sure, a move to x86 can
be accomplished. But, until someone offers up a plausible
scenario for how Apple can achieve this transition without
completely destroying it?s current revenue stream, I will remain
skeptical. Apple?s Mac business is growing for the first time in
years. They are on track for a 12 billion dollar year. If they
announce a multi-year migration to x86, current Mac sales will
plummet and revenues will drop by at least 75%.
Furthermore, what would motivate large developers like Adobe,
MS, Macromedia, etc. to go through another re-development
cycle on a platform with such a marginal market share after
spending millions of dollars recently to port their applications to
OS X on PPC?
I would love to hear any ideas on on these business issues. I, for
one, will sell my position in Apple and postpone any purchases if
a move to x86 is announced tomorrow. I have no bias against
the x86 and understand the bad position Apple is in regarding
the lack of laptop-compatible G5 CPUs, but I can?t see how this
transition can take place without devastating the company?s
revenue and valuation.
Jobs...PERIOD.
After the "rumormonger" sites mess in the past...MAYBE, Jobs &
Co. are simply messing with the press. Maybe they are just
"leaking" DIS-information to the press, so as to throw them off
on a "rant & flame" blog war BS, while they are working on what
WILL ACTUALLY be revealed at the WWDC KEYNOTE.
IT AIN'T OVER TILL THE MAN IN THE BLACK TURTLENECK SHIRT
SAYS...."AND ONE MORE THING..."